- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 3, 2007

BOSTON (AP) - Massachusetts’ governor ordered state officials to record the “marriages” of 26 out-of-state homosexual couples whose unions were blocked by his predecessor, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

“I think that the previous administration was using a gimmick to make what I feel was a discriminatory point,” Gov. Deval Patrick, a Democrat, said in announcing the move. “It’s a simple gesture to include the information on the register. Keeping it out was the gimmick.”

Registering the “marriages” in Massachusetts’ vital records won’t change the legal marriage status of the couples in their home states.

About 8,000 same-sex couples have “wed” in Massachusetts since the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 2003 that the state constitution guarantees homosexuals the right to marry. A few other states offer civil unions with similar rights for same-sex couples, but only Massachusetts allows same-sex “marriage.”

Last spring, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that Mr. Romney could use a 1913 law to prohibit out-of-state couples from marrying in Massachusetts if their home states explicitly prohibit same-sex marriage.

The 26 couples affected by Mr. Patrick’s decision had obtained marriage licenses in four towns where clerks defied Mr. Romney’s order not to issue marriage licenses to out-of-state same-sex couples.

Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said the former governor was right to refuse to record the “marriages” because Massachusetts law does not recognize marriages between same-sex couples from outside the state.

“It was Governor Romney’s enforcement of this law that stopped gay marriage from being visited on every other state in the country,” Mr. Fehrnstrom told the Boston Globe. “Now that Governor Romney is out of office, we are seeing an erosion of the previously strong defense of traditional marriage coming out of the executive branch.”

State Department of Public Health Commissioner John Auerbach said Monday he will move quickly to act on Mr. Patrick’s request. He called it “fitting and welcome that our state will now treat the recording of all marriage certificates equally.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide