- The Washington Times - Friday, August 24, 2007

ASSOCIATED PRESS

A federal appeals court yesterday cleared the way for Whole Foods Market Inc. to buy rival organic grocer Wild Oats Markets Inc.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied a request by the Federal Trade Commission to block the $565 million sale pending the outcome of an appeal.

Whole Foods lawyers argued such a ruling would have killed the deal.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman refused to step in last week and block the deal, a decision that federal regulators quickly appealed.



They claimed if the two grocers combine, it would mean less competition and higher prices for premium and organic food.

The appeals court, in a brief ruling, agreed the FTC “raised some questions” about the deal, but the judges said the agency had not proved that Judge Friedman’s decision was flawed.

In his 93-page ruling, Judge Friedman rejected the FTC’s argument that the two stores compete in a narrow market of “premium, natural and organic supermarkets.” He said supermarket chains such as Safeway and Kroger are selling more fresh and organic produce and redesigning many of their stores to compete with Whole Foods.

About 60 percent of natural and organic food products sold come from conventional stores, he noted.

Whole Foods officials have said they would move at the first opportunity to close the deal. The company’s tender offer to purchase all outstanding shares of Wild Oats stock expires Monday.

Judge Friedman made no mention in his ruling of several notorious e-mails and other documents written by Whole Foods chief executive John Mackey that the FTC cited in its effort to block the deal.

For example, Mr. Mackey said in a February e-mail to a company board member that the acquisition would enable Whole Foods to “avoid nasty price wars” with Wild Oats in several cities.

The FTC requested a stay of Judge Friedman’s ruling Aug. 17, charging in a court filing that he “utterly ignored the bulk of the commission’s case, including clear and authoritative statements by principals that the rationale for the transaction is to eliminate competition.”

The appeals court agreed Monday to delay the transaction so it could consider additional information. Its ruling yesterday came just hours after the FTC was expected to file its final brief in the case.

Keith Hylton, an antitrust law professor at Boston University, said courts in antitrust cases are putting more weight on “objective evidence … and less on statements” by company executives.

“All firms want to take over their markets and eliminate their competitors,” he added. “Not many are successful. In the end, courts have to look at what the firm did — not what it said — and try to determine whether the firm’s actions really harmed competition.”

The ruling was released after markets closed. Whole Foods shares rose 62 cents to $43.96 in extended trading after closing down 19 cents at $43.34. Wild Oats shares jumped 42 cents, or 2.3 percent, to $18.49, after closing down 2 cents to $18.07.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide