- The Washington Times - Sunday, February 4, 2007

NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. (AP) — September’s national spinach recall has shaken consumer confidence in the safety of leafy green vegetables, according to a new national survey.

Consumers are still avoiding greens and questioning safety issues months after spinach contaminated with E. coli bacteria killed three persons and sickened nearly 200.

Plummeting spinach sales have also prompted the produce industry to seek federal oversight to assure buyers that fresh produce is safe.

“We need to be in front of this to maintain consumer confidence,” said Tom Stenzel, president of the United Fresh Produce Association. “Consumers need to eat fresh produce and feel safe in their choices,” he said.

A new national survey to be released today by Rutgers University suggests that the broad recall could have lasting effects on spinach and other similar vegetables. As a result, consumers felt uncertain and threw away other bagged produce that was not affected by the recall.

William K. Hallman, director of the Food Policy Institute at Rutgers, called the September spinach recall — and the E. coli contamination at Taco Bells on the East Coast three months later — a “signal event” in the public’s perception of food safety.

“Consumers’ expectations were violated by the fact that a product they thought was clean and wholesome turned out to be something they did not expect,” he said. “It raises questions about other produce that are grown in the same way.”

The survey showed nearly 9 out of 10 consumers said they heard about the recall, but nearly 1 in 3 said they didn’t know the recall was over when the survey was taken. About 1 in 5 who were aware of the recall also stopped eating other bagged produce, and 7 percent threw out fresh produce other than spinach during the recall. More than 75 percent of respondents with spinach in their home threw it out.

More than half of the people who ate spinach before the recall hadn’t returned to eating it when the survey was taken.

Uncertainty generated by the inability to quickly pinpoint the source of the contamination and the broad nature of the recall caused confusion, Mr. Hallman said.

“This has caused people to take a step back and think about what they’re eating in terms of produce, more generally than just spinach, and where it comes from,” he said.

The national telephone survey of 1,200 persons was conducted over three weeks in November, more than six weeks after the spinach recall but before the Taco Bell outbreak. The sampling margin of error was 3 percentage points.

Some consumers such as Anna Blanco have yet to buy spinach or bagged salads since the recall. Before the outbreak, she bought spinach once a week.

“You don’t know if it’s going to happen again,” said Mrs. Blanco, 62, as she shopped at a Whole Foods store in West Orange, N.J. “I don’t buy anything bagged. I can get other vegetables, carrots or broccoli.”

Sales figures through Dec. 23 from 16,000 conventional supermarkets, not including big-box stores such as Wal-Mart or Costco, showed an overall 14 percent drop in spinach sales from a year ago, according to the Perishables Group. Bulk spinach dropped by nearly half, and packaged salad without spinach dropped about 10 percent.

“The spinach contamination may have had a spillover effect to other produce items,” said Ed Mackowiak, vice president of sales for FreshLook Marketing. His company’s survey of 17,000 grocery stores, not including Wal-Mart or Costco, showed a nearly 17 percent drop in sales of bulk and bagged spinach for 2006 as compared with a year ago.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide