- The Washington Times - Wednesday, January 10, 2007

ENTEBBE, Uganda — After three years of closed-door talks, nine nations are quietly edging toward an agreement to jointly oversee the waters of the Nile, an accord that has eluded countries along the great river since the days of the pharaohs.

An expected meeting of water ministers this month may produce a preliminary accord, officials say. “I hope we’ll reach a very good result, but I cannot guarantee it,” Egyptian negotiator Abdel Fattah Metawie said in Cairo, the likely venue for the session.

Such an agreement would right a colonial-era wrong that reserved the world’s longest river for irrigation in Egypt and Sudan, effectively denying its waters to Uganda and other upriver countries.

Nature may be pushing political leaders toward compromise, said Gordon Mumbo of the Nile Basin Initiative, an umbrella office here for joint activities among the riverine nations.

Drought and heat have lowered the level of nearby Lake Victoria, the vast lake that spills an outlet stream northward to start the Nile’s 4,000-mile meander from this region of jungle and crocodiles to the camel-crossed deserts of Egypt and the Mediterranean Sea.

“One of the greatest realizations is that the waters of the Nile from Lake Victoria are finite. They can be depleted,” said Mr. Mumbo, a regional project manager. “The issue is how can people come together and best manage them today and tomorrow.”

The long-term vision includes irrigated crops from central Africa feeding Egypt, for example, and Ethiopian dams supplying hydroelectric power across the region.

Even millennia back, Egypt’s pharaonic empire tried to push its rule south to ensure no one would block its lifeline to the Nile.

The dispute today, when almost all of Egypt’s water comes from the river, is rooted in a 1929 treaty that — with a 1959 amendment — guarantees 89 percent of the river flow for Egypt and Sudan, and forbids people upriver to build, without Egypt’s approval, irrigation or other projects that might reduce water volume significantly. Even today, Egypt maintains river inspectors in Uganda.

The original treaty was negotiated between Egypt and Britain, then the colonial ruler of Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania, now independent nations at the headwaters of the White Nile’s branch. The Nile has two main tributaries: the White Nile and the Blue Nile.

“They were taking care of people who knew what they wanted. We were not consulted,” said Uganda’s water minister, Maria Mutagamba. “We are now independent. We can sit at the table and negotiate.”

The 1929 treaty didn’t cover sovereign Ethiopia, source of the Blue Nile, which merges with the White Nile in Sudan. But Ethiopia’s deep poverty, and Egyptian diplomatic pressure and military threats, kept it from diverting the waters.

In addition, the World Bank, the region’s prime lender, refrains from financing projects that might harm downriver countries without their approval.

“For us, it was a question of financial capacity,” Ethiopian negotiator Teferra Beyene said by telephone from Addis Ababa. “We hope this agreement may remove some of these constraints.”

The agreement among Nile nations — also including Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, all of which contain remote river sources — won’t assign shares of river water, but it will formalize the principle of equal voices and establish a nine-nation commission to tackle detailed issues later.

The need for consensus — giving Egypt a veto — will protect what Mr. Metawie called his country’s rights to 1.9 trillion cubic feet of water per year. But there cannot be plenty of water to go around, he said, because so much today is lost to waste and poor rain catchment upriver.

“The problem is more of management than of resources,” he said.

Negotiators have focused on developing “win-win” projects benefiting many nations by using Egyptian technical help, trade agreements and other regional approaches.

“Instead of the Egyptians growing oranges where they have to irrigate every field,” Miss Mutagamba said, “they can grow oranges here,” where rainfall makes irrigation less vital.

Ethiopian and Egyptian engineers point to another possibility: replacing Egypt’s Lake Nasser, a desert reservoir that loses huge amounts of water to evaporation, with a less wasteful reservoir in Ethiopia’s cooler highlands. In an even grander vision, planners see an electrical grid sending Ethiopian hydropower everywhere.

Even with a framework agreement, however, the way ahead isn’t clear. “The feasibility studies have been done, but the finances aren’t there,” Mr. Mumbo said. An observer of Nile diplomacy, Cairo political scientist Sharif S. Elmusa, said something else is missing, too:

“There isn’t that kind of trust yet between Egypt and Ethiopia — to say, ‘OK, build the dam for electricity,’ when you can’t guarantee that Ethiopia won’t use it for other purposes,” he said.

Trust may soon face new strains on the Nile, as water demand rises and water volume falls. Analysts from the United Nations say populations in the river basin may double by midcentury. U.N. climatologists, meanwhile, say computer scenarios show global warming reducing water flows in the Nile by up to 40 percent.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide