- The Washington Times - Monday, March 12, 2007


A woman who stole from a patient in a nursing home where she works was ordered to make potpourri-filled vases for a senior center.

A man convicted of driving with a suspended license had to carve a cane for an elderly person.

An artist convicted of driving under the influence created a painting for an organization over whose lawn she drove.

Those are some of the examples of the unusual sentences crafted by Vermont’s groundbreaking Reparative Probation system, under which criminals meet with community volunteers — and in some cases victims — to craft their sentences instead of taking them from a judge.

The system appears to work.

A survey by three college professors that was funded by a grant from the Justice Department found that in 9,078 cases handled between 1998 and 2005, offenders were 23 percent less likely to commit another crime while on probation than those sentenced to traditional probation.

They also were 12 percent less likely to commit another crime after probation ended.

“This is a bit of a vindication for Vermont’s reparative boards,” said Gale Burford, a professor of social work at the University of Vermont and one of the authors of the yet-to-be published survey. He said that in some circles, Vermont was perceived as being soft on crime.

“The people who go to these boards don’t regard them as soft because they are emotional and they are getting faced by people in their community,” Mr. Burford said. “It is not a soft option.”

The people who work with the system every day say its successes go beyond just reducing recidivism.

“Those numbers are important, but I can tell you it works on so many other levels, in terms of the relationships built and the conversations that are had and the new perspectives that people have about their own lives and other peoples’ lives,” said Cara Gleason, the community justice coordinator for the city of Burlington.

The Corrections Department set up the pioneering program in 1995, when the state was looking for alternatives to traditional corrections.

Reparative probation was part of a package of sentencing alternatives — such as requiring offenders to complete intensive substance-abuse programs or closely supervised furlough in the community — made available to Vermont judges.

Several communities across the country now use some form of reparative justice.

What makes Vermont unusual is that the system was conceived by the Department of Corrections, said Kay Pranis, of St. Paul, Minn., who has worked with restorative justice programs across the country.

“Out of a state agency came an effort that has become a community-based effort and really belongs to the community,” Miss Pranis said. “That is a huge accomplishment.”

In the reparative probation system, the offender meets with community members and they try to craft a sentence that builds on the interests of the offender and the needs of the victim and the community.

The victims participate in some cases.

“I think across the board, almost everyone says that’s when it’s most transformational is when the person who has been the most affected gets to meet with the person who caused them harm,” said Rain Banbury, of the Greater Barre Community Justice Center.

Now, 12 community justice centers across the state and many more volunteer boards meet with the offenders. The volunteer boards are chosen from interested members of the community.

By design, the hearings lack the structured formality of a court appearance.

That is how a single mother working in a nursing home comes to see how stealing a ring from a patient affects the victim. So the board builds on the offender’s interest in crafts and sentences her to make vases for the senior center.

Or why the man convicted of driving with a suspended license could agree to use his passion for carving to create a carved cane for an elderly person. Or the artist convicted a second time for driving under the influence could create a painting for, coincidentally, the substance abuse center over whose lawn she drove, said Lori Baker, the executive director of the Barre Justice Center.

Without addressing the artist’s case directly, Miss Baker said, “In specific cases, it would be up to the judge and the prosecutor to decide” if an offender should be allowed to go before the board after two offenses.

The solutions, by design, are as varied as the crimes.

“It shows that we can involve community volunteers, lay people, in processing a large percentage of our low-level crimes rather than dealing with them more formally either in government supervised probation or the even more expensive option in court,” Mr. Burford said.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide