- The Washington Times - Thursday, March 22, 2007

President Bush appealed for patience as the Iraq war entered its fifth year. In a televised address from the White House, the president warned of the consequences if America were to “pack up and go home.”

He appeared to be pleading, not leading. Where are the convictions of conscience, the soaring rhetoric, the broad vision and the dire warnings of failure? Did these go out the door with the departure of Michael Gerson, his best speechwriter?

The president can be persuasive in the content of his speeches and eloquent in his delivery. We saw a different man after September 11, 2001, than we saw before, or see now. The loss of eloquence has given his political opponents new opportunities, not only to make his life miserable, but also to encourage the enemy in their perception of a divided nation. His weekly radio addresses are lifeless and delivered in a monotonous cadence, as if he wishes he were someplace else.

Speeches matter: Abraham Lincoln at Cooper Union and his Second Inaugural address; Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill in World War II; John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural address; Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have A Dream” speech; Ronald Reagan’s tear-producing “Boys of Pointe du Hoc” speech commemorating D-Day at Normandy and the one he delivered after the Challenger disaster and George Bush’s post-September 11 speech to Congress. If you can’t rise to the occasion as president, or when history calls in some other great capacity, when can you?

The president needs to go on the offensive, not just on the war, but also on domestic issues. There was a glimmer of an offense in his challenge to Democrats over a “show trial” regarding the firing of eight U.S. attorneys. But verbal combat is not his gift and he is dealing from a weakened position with a Democratic Congress.

On the war, he should constantly quote what al Qaeda and other extremist organizations say is their objective for us. He should ask war opponents, “Do you think they are lying?” The president should invite Iraqis to America to thank us for our investment — of blood and capital — in the cause of their freedom. He should ask war opponents, “Would you prefer they were still under Saddam Hussein’s murderous regime? Sens. Obama, Schumer, Durbin, Reid and Speaker Pelosi, tell them that to their faces.”

Then the president should ask war opponents, “If we were to pull out before we are certain that the elected Iraqi government can stand on its own, what will happen next? Iraq would surely be overrun by al Qaeda fanatics who would then establish a radical Islamic state like they did in Afghanistan, using that state as a terror base to eliminate Israel and come after Europe and the United States with renewed vigor. When that happens, will you take responsibility for it? I doubt it.”

On the earmarks Democrats are loading onto the supplemental spending bill for Iraq, the president should list them and their authors by name and shame them before the American people. He won’t because he’s too nice, which is a wonderful personal trait but it cannot make one a great president. Better to be a nasty success than a genial failure. Mr. Bush gets no points from his Democratic opponents for congeniality.

If the president cares not only about a legacy, but in seeing his Iraq policy successfully completed, he had better start defending it and proclaiming the truth as he sees it before his opponents pound him to political death. The left has no strategy for victory, only defeat. They won’t say what would happen without a strong America opposing Islamofascism. Their strategy is retreat and defeat.

Why can’t Mr. Bush say these things? Is he afraid liberals won’t like him? They already don’t like him. He shouldn’t care if they like him less. The president is not the head of an etiquette club. He is a political leader and is also supposed to be a moral and military leader. The United States once was feared. Now, third-rate terrorists and puny dictators think they can do anything to us with few, if any, consequences. If conciliation and kindness won’t do the job, fear might.

This business about U.S. attorneys is a distraction. Important issues need to be addressed. Where is the president’s voice? Where is his confidence? Where is his leadership? It’s way past time to “kick butt.”

Cal Thomas is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide