- The Washington Times - Thursday, October 4, 2007


Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Soviet launch of Sputnik, an event that caused profound shock and panic verging on hysteria in the United States.

Newsweek declared that Sputnik constituted a Soviet victory in three areas: pure science, practical know-how and psychological Cold War. Some compared Sputnik to Pearl Harbor, while many warned that American defenses were inadequate. Critics blamed the Eisenhower administration for the nation’s alleged “missile gap,” “education gap,” and “propaganda gap.”

Coupled with the Soviet Union’s successful testing of an ICBM in August and its massive hydrogen bomb tests in September, the launch of this small satellite (184 pounds) seemed to supply irrefutable evidence that the Soviets had greatly surpassed the United States in ballistic missile technology.

The Eisenhower administration’s response to these dramatic developments was threefold. First, the president announced that Project Vanguard would launch a satellite in December. This mission was a disaster: the first launch was aborted; when the rocket was launched two days later it quickly exploded (prompting such lampoons as “Flopnik” and “Dudnik”); and ultimately the mission was canceled.

The United States finally launched a rocket (Explorer I) on Jan. 31, 1958, but this was greatly overshadowed by the orbiting of Sputnik II two months earlier, which weighed 1,121 pounds and carried a dog, and the May launching of Sputnik III, which weighed 3,000 pounds and housed numerous instruments.

Second, Eisenhower tried to reassure Americans that the nation’s military could easily counter any enemy attack. In four televised addresses during the fall of 1957 he accentuated the incredible power of the U.S. military. He created the President’s Scientific Advisory Committee and appointed a czar to supervise the government’s missile programs. Eisenhower also authorized a substantial increase of the military budget for the next fiscal year (although far less than some advocated), accelerated the IntermediateRange Ballistic Missile program, and sought to deploy missiles in Europe. Finally, he laid the foundation for the National Defense Education Act, which emphasized that scientific education and more extensive research were crucial to the nation’s long-term security.

Third, Eisenhower insisted the United States must wage “total cold war” to defeat the Soviets. This involved the use of “economic development, trade, diplomacy, education, ideas and principles.” Chief among these “ideas and principles” were biblical and spiritual tenets. Like Franklin Roosevelt, Eisenhower repeatedly stressed the need of a national spiritual revival to enable Americans to deal effectively with their problems at home and abroad. “Bullets and guns and planes and ships,” the president declared, could “produce no real or lasting peace.”

Neither could “edicts and treaties, no matter how solemnly signed,” nor could economic arrangements, no matter how favorable. “Only a great moral crusade” carrying out God’s will, he proclaimed, would succeed.

As Roosevelt did during World War II when depicting the struggle against the Axis Powers, and as Ronald Reagan would do later, Eisenhower often described the Cold War as a religious crusade, a conflict between righteous and ungodly foes, a battle to preserve Christian civilization. Like most of the nation’s leaders of his generation, he was convinced of American moral pre-eminence.

The United States would ultimately triumph over its godless, immoral foe, the Soviet Union, Eisenhower contended, because it rested on spiritual and moral principles and defended democracy, a system of government that recognized human dignity and protected individual rights.

In waging ideological warfare against communism, Eisenhower sometimes contrasted the Soviet Union’s material achievements with U.S. spiritual accomplishments. America’s moral vitality, he argued, was more impressive than Soviet missiles that hit the moon and orbited the sun. While communists put their faith in their triumphs in space, Americans put their faith in the “service of God and man.” “Our Protestant beliefs and convictions,” Eisenhower trumpeted, provided a sound basis for “our civilization and government.” He castigated “Russia’s hostility to free government — and to the religious faith” on which it “is built.”

The Free World, Eisenhower repeatedly insisted, must use spiritual, intellectual, and material weapons to defeat communism.

Such comments prompted the editors of the Nation to bemoan “the evangelical certainty” with which the president “described the ‘forces of good and evil’ now locked in mortal combat in the world.” This characterization, they protested, thwarted efforts to resolve disputes between the United States and the Soviets. Nevertheless, such rhetoric expressed some of the core convictions of a man, who, although he did not join a church until the second Sunday of his presidency, considered himself “the most intensely religious man I know.”

Eisenhower’s faith affected how he responded to many of the challenges of his presidency, especially the Cold War. His response to the crisis Sputnik produced was consistent with his general approach: he continually urged Americans to pray for peace, called for religious renewal, and promoted the use of spiritual weapons.

Gary Scott Smith is chairman of the History Department at Grove City College in Pennsylvania and is the author of “Faith and the Presidency: From George Washington to George W. Bush” (Oxford University Press, 2006).

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide