- The Washington Times - Wednesday, September 12, 2007

President Bush will endorse the recommendation of Army Gen. David H. Petraeus and and announce this week a withdrawal of almost 30,000 U.S. forces from Iraq by next summer, administration officials say.

Gen. Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq, testified Monday before lawmakers that he favored the reduction in forces as long as decisions about future troop levels were postponed until next summer as well.

The president’s troop reduction, which will be announced in a nationally televised speech at 9 p.m. tomorrow, will be a few thousand less than the 30,000 advised by Gen. Petraeus, a White House official told The Washington Times on the condition of anonymity.

Mr. Bush met with congressional leaders of both parties yesterday, as Gen. Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan C. Crocker completed their second day of joint testimony on Capitol Hill.

Mr. Bush welcomed the leaders of the Democrat-led Congress to the White House, and said he asked them “to come and share their thoughts about Iraq.”

“I think it’s very important before I make up my mind that I consult with the leaders of the House and the Senate,” Mr. Bush said.

But administration officials said Mr. Bush already had decided to follow his general’s advice.

Angry Democrats walked out of the meeting and denounced Gen. Petraeus’ plan. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it “a 10-year or more commitment for a long-term occupation of Iraq.”

“This is just an attempt to keep a long-term, high-level deployment in Iraq, which is not encouraging the Iraqi government to make any changes,” said Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat. “The more successful you are militarily, the more expectation there is that there will be some political change. The measure is political. It hasn’t happened.”

Mrs. Pelosi said it was “an insult to the intelligence of the American people” to call Gen. Petraeus’ plan for a 30,000-troop reduction a new direction, and said Democrats would continue to push for a full redeployment of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said he would keep trying to peel off Republicans to obtain a veto-proof majority.

Republican leaders said their party would support the Petraeus plan and continue to uphold Mr. Bush’s veto threats against legislation mandating dramatic withdrawals of troops.

“General Petraeus has given us a way forward,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican. “I’m optimistic that when all is said and done, his suggestions will be largely the position in the Senate.”

Yesterday, Gen. Petraeus warned lawmakers that a “precipitous withdrawal” from Iraq would embolden al Qaeda terrorists and the hostile Islamic regime in Iran.

Al Qaeda remains “a very, very dangerous foe,” one that wants “to continue to inflict enormous death and destruction on the Iraqi people,” said Gen. Petraeus, during back-to-back hearings with the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees.

But senators subjected Gen. Petraeus and Mr. Crocker to intense questioning on whether the war in Iraq plays a significant role in protecting the U.S. from future attacks by Islamic extremists.

“Does this make America safer?” Sen. John W. Warner, Virginia Republican, asked Gen. Petraeus about keeping large numbers of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.

Gen. Petraeus said he was focused on the mission in Iraq, but when prodded a second time by Mr. Warner, he answered, “I don’t know.”

Both Gen. Petraeus and Mr. Crocker said in addition to emboldening enemies, leaving Iraq too quickly would likely lead to “massive human suffering” caused by sectarian fighting.

Mr. Bush is expected to argue in his address that the U.S. should continue to fight terrorists and insurgents in Iraq, which could require several more years of engagement.

The politically costly idea of long-term engagement will be offset by the endorsement of short-term withdrawal.

The White House stayed quiet for most of the past two days, allowing Gen. Petraeus and Mr. Crocker to have center stage as they made the case for a continued presence in Iraq.

“It’s smart,” said Kenneth Pollack, a leading specialist on Iraq from the Brookings Institution. “This administration has lost all credibility with the American people on the subject of Iraq.”

“After four years of ‘victory is just around the corner’ and ‘mission accomplished,’ the American people are no longer willing to listen to this White House when it comes to Iraq,” said Mr. Pollack, a former Iraq analyst for the CIA who worked in President Clinton’s National Security Council.

Also, attacks on Gen. Petraeus in the press and during the hearings by liberal antiwar groups MoveOn.org and Code Pink seemed only to help ennoble the general and Mr. Crocker.

White House press secretary Tony Snow permitted himself some gloating yesterday, saying, “It can’t have been good for Democrats yesterday to have had the MoveOn ad, or to have had the Code Pink protesters.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide