- The Washington Times - Monday, April 21, 2008

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — No weapon is more important to tens of thousands of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan than the carbine rifle. And for well over a decade, the military has relied on one company, Colt Defense of Hartford, Conn., to make the M4s they trust with their lives.

Now, as Congress considers spending millions more on the guns, this exclusive arrangement is being criticized as a bad deal for American forces as well as for taxpayers, according to interviews and research conducted by the Associated Press.

“What we have is a fat contractor in Colt who’s gotten very rich off our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican.

The M4, which can fire at a rate of 700 to 950 bullets a minute, is a shorter and lighter version of the company’s M16 rifle first used 40 years ago during the Vietnam War. It normally carries a 30-round magazine. At about $1,500 apiece, the M4 is overpriced, Mr. Coburn said. He also said it jams too often in sandy environments like Iraq and requires far more maintenance than more durable carbines.

“And if you tend to have the problem at the wrong time, you’re putting your life on the line,” said Mr. Coburn, who began examining the M4’s performance last year after receiving complaints from soldiers. “The fact is, the American GI today doesn’t have the best weapon. And they ought to.”

U.S. military officials don’t agree. They call the M4 an excellent carbine. When the time comes to replace the M4, they want a combat rifle that is leaps and bounds beyond what’s currently available.

“There’s not a weapon out there that’s significantly better than the M4,” said Col. Robert Radcliffe, director of combat developments at the Army Infantry Center in Fort Benning, Ga. “To replace it with something that has essentially the same capabilities as we have today doesn’t make good sense.”

Colt’s exclusive production agreement ends in June 2009. At that point, the Army, in its role as the military’s principal buyer of firearms, may have other gunmakers compete along with Colt for continued M4 production. Or, it might begin looking for a new weapon.

“We haven’t made up our mind yet,” Col. Radcliffe said.

William Keys, Colt’s chief executive officer, says the M4 gets impressive reviews from the battlefield. And he worries that bashing the carbine will undermine the confidence that the troops have in it.

“The guy killing the enemy with this gun loves it,” said Mr. Keys, a former Marine Corps general who was awarded the Navy Cross for battlefield valor in Vietnam. “I’m not going to stand here and disparage the senator, but I think he’s wrong.”

In 2006, a nonprofit research group surveyed 2,600 troops who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan and found that 89 percent were satisfied with the M4. Although Colt and the Army have trumpeted that finding, detractors say the survey also revealed that 19 percent of these soldiers had their weapon jam during a firefight.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide