- The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 23, 2008


In only his third year as a U.S. senator, Barack Obama repeatedly exceeded fund-raising expectations throughout 2007 as his presidential campaign collected $102 million in contributions. It turned out that he was just getting warmed up. During the first three months of this year, he raised a stunning $132 million. The monthly fund-raising totals were $36 million in January, $55 million in February and $41 million in March. Between January 2007 and March 2008, he raised nearly $234 million.

After barely topping Mr. Obama by collecting net contributions of $105 million during 2007, Hillary Clinton fell way behind during 2008 after people began casting votes. During the first quarter of this year, she raised only $69 million. Her monthly fund-raising figures for the first quarter were $14 million in January ($22 million less than Mr. Obama’s), $35 million in February ($20 million less than Mr. Obama’s) and $20 million in March ($21 million less than Mr. Obama’s). Beyond the $173 million in contributions that she raised between January 2007 and March 2008, Mrs. Clinton transferred $10 million to her presidential campaign from her 2006 Senate race and personally lent another $5 million to her presidential effort.

In addition to falling $61 million below Mr. Obama’s total contributions through March, Mrs. Clinton’s fund-raising total included $23 million that could only be spent during the general-election campaign. Mr. Obama raised only $8 million in general-election money.

Through March, Mr. Obama’s total campaign-operating expenditures ($188 million) exceeded those of Mrs. Clinton ($160 million) by $28 million. Such a large spending differential has almost certainly made a significant contribution to Mr. Obama’s narrow leads in the cumulative popular vote and in pledged delegates.

Even after Mr. Obama had spent nearly $30 million more than Mrs. Clinton through March, because of the huge advantage he enjoyed in fund-raising for the primary campaign, Mr. Obama entered April with a massive cash-on-hand advantage over his rival. On April 1, three weeks before yesterday’s crucial Pennsylvania primary, his campaign balance sheet reflected $43 million in primary-campaign cash and less than $1 million in debts.

After setting aside the $23 million in money that can be spent only during the general election, Mrs. Clinton entered April with less than $9 million available for the primaries, according to her recent filing with the Federal Election Commission. However, that filing also revealed that her campaign had more than $10 million in debts above and beyond the $5 million she owed to herself for her personal loan. Like the millions of “homeowners” whose mortgage balances exceed the value of their homes, the Clinton presidential campaign was “underwater.”



Click to Read More

Click to Hide