- The Washington Times - Monday, April 28, 2008

OTTAWA (Agence France-Presse) — A complaint by Canadian Muslims against a leading local newsmagazine has sparked a national debate on the limits of press freedoms in this country, often cited as a beacon of multiculturalism.

“Protest while you still can,” shouted this week’s edition of Maclean’s, a publication similar to U.S. magazines Time or Newsweek, saying in an editorial that human rights boards are undermining free speech in Canada.

The controversy dates back to October 2006 when Maclean’s ran an article titled “Why the Future Belongs to Islam,” excerpted from the book “America Alone,” by journalist Mark Steyn.

A self-described agitator, Mr. Steyn — whose columns often appear in The Washington Times — argued that demographics and Muslims’ global ambitions ensured Islam’s eventual world domination and that Europe is “too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia.”

For four Toronto law students, Maclean’s crossed the line by proposing that “Muslims are part of a global conspiracy to take over Western society and impose an oppressive form of Islamic law,” Khurrum Awan, one of the students, told Agence France-Presse.

“We did some research and realized that Maclean’s had published 19 articles with such a tone,” he said, adding that his group asked for but was denied the opportunity to publish a response when they met with the magazine’s editors.

Maclean’s, which is defending itself against accusations at a human rights tribunal that its articles incited hate, said the students’ demands for a 5,000-word rebuttal and to direct the magazine cover art were unacceptable.

The students, backed by the Canadian Islamic Congress, lodged a complaint with the federal human rights commission and two of its provincial counterparts in Ontario and British Columbia.

The federal and British Columbia tribunals are still considering the case.

The Ontario panel declined to hear it, yet offered a stern rebuke of Maclean’s on April 9, which prompted indignation from the magazine.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission said in a statement that the contents of press articles were beyond its purview but added that it “has serious concerns about the content of a number of articles concerning Muslims” published by Maclean’s and other media outlets that were “identified as contributing to Islamophobia and promoting societal intolerance towards Muslims.”

Supported by several media outlets, Maclean’s said it is “deeply troubling” that a public official would castigate the press without offering it an opportunity to defend itself at a hearing.

The magazine also called for “an unambiguous reaffirmation of the right to freedom of expression, and assurance that reasonable limits on free speech are in fact reasonable.”

Alan Borovoy, an attorney for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said human rights commissions should limit their decisions to acts, and not “restrict the free expression of opinion.”

For Julius Grey, an advocate for minority rights, “all restrictions on freedom of expression are appalling” and he said the students in this case “chose the wrong target.”

“But they’re right to complain about Islamophobia,” he told Agence France-Presse, noting that “since the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, Muslims are not treated the same as everybody else.”

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide