- The Washington Times - Friday, February 1, 2008


Late last month, allegations of vote fraud in Kenya’s closely fought presidential election sparked riots and demonstrations throughout the country.

Kenya’s crisis, however, “has mutated from an electoral dispute into much deeper problems with a high potential for recurrence,” former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan told a reporter with Nairobi’s East African Standard. Mr. Annan went to Kenya to try to mediate the political dispute and calm violent tribal passions.

All too often in the developing world tribes and ethnic groups form the core of political parties. With ethnicity for tinder, minor political squabbles — much less issues involving the control of national institutions like a presidency — risk igniting deadly ethnic conflict.

In Kenya, East Africa’s “stable nation,” ethnic fighting has ignited. Diplomats and cooler Kenyan leaders are trying to confine the ugly violence. Kenya matters. Kenya has provided a stabilizing political influence in a war-wrecked region — violent conflicts tear its neighbors Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia and Uganda. Kenya has been a reliable U.S. ally with its port, Mombasa, welcoming the U.S. Navy. It is a regional economic powerhouse. Still, the intertribal violence recalls impoverished Rwanda’s ghastly 1994 genocide.

Mr. Annan may be the best mediator available. A former secretary-general underscores global concern, and his presence appeals to the egos of Kenya’s two rival leaders, President Mwai Kibaki (who claims he won the presidential election) and opposition leader Raila Odinga (who claims Mr. Kibaki won by fraud). Mr. Annan attracts international media attention.

While an intense media spotlight certainly doesn’t stop violence in some circumstances, it can have a damping effect. Kenya, with its comparatively free press and relatively high literacy rate, may be one of those circumstances where shameful images of self-destruction and eloquent pleas for restraint reinforce the sensible.

Charges of cronyism and corruption tag Mr. Annan, however — the United Nations’ fraud-riddled Oil for Food program being the most noxious case in point. Mr. Annan mentioned “deeper problems” and doubtlessly referred to Kenyan tribal divisions. But tribal cronyism and its frequent companion, debilitating government corruption, are also deeper problems that stunt Kenyan modernization and exacerbate the current crisis.

Mr. Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) outpolled Mr. Kibaki’s Party of National Unity (PNU) in parliamentary races, giving both parties a governmental power base. Kenyan’s presidency, however, is a very strong institution.

In the past, both Mr. Kibaki and Mr. Odinga have professed anti-corruption agendas. In the 2002 presidential race, Mr. Odinga supported Mr. Kibaki. Last year, Mr. Odinga denounced Mr. Kibaki’s failure to control corruption and ran a populist campaign that targeted “the wealthy.” Mr. Odinga is from the Luo tribe. Mr. Kibaki is a Kikuyu. After the election, it appears that to some ethnic Luo rioters “the wealthy” may be a code word for Kikuyus. The Kikuyu are Kenya’s “business tribe,” and tend to be wealthier and have more access to education opportunities. Kikuyu critics charge them with cronyism. The Kikuyu respond that their success incites envy.

Sensational comparisons to Rwanda’s 1994 nightmare neglect the vast difference in scale. Eight hundred thousand died in Rwanda’s genocide. So far, Kenya’s toll is between 600 and 700. Yes, that’s a terrible bloodletting and a warning, but also establishes perspective. Demonstrations continue nationwide, but the worst violence remains localized. Mr. Annan wants to help keep it that way, and there is time to encourage sober compromise.

As for the future? There is cause for hope. On a visit to Kenya six years ago, I acquired a copy of “Inside Sudan: The Story of People to People Peacemaking in Southern Sudan.” Published by the New Sudan Council of Churches, the book described in detail peacemaking strategies pursued in the midst of southern Sudan’s complex tribal and religious war.

The strategies included using tribal reconciliation rituals to coax tribal leaders into negotiating or to help amenable leaders draw antagonized and alienated tribesmen into a peace process with their enemies.

The book was published in Nairobi.

Austin Bay is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide