- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 14, 2008

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Americans will learn a lot about themselves as six Islamist terror “suspects” (I guess we have to say, technically) held at Guantanamo Bay finally face trial on murder and war crimes charges connected with the attacks of September 11, 2001.

A country in which women fall in love with convicted murderers, one largely alienated from the president who brought down Saddam Hussein, may have some surprises in store for foreigners who think the Yanks mean to hang, draw and quarter these lambs.

Prosecutors at the military trials of the six will seek the death penalty in each case. That’s as you might suspect, given that the death toll the six are accused of engineering totaled nearly 3,000.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — do you often see, by the way, more baleful mugs than his, even if physiognomy signifies neither guilt nor innocence? Khalid, I say, supposedly has confessed to numerous anti-U.S. terror activities, with September 11 the capstone atop the granite shaft. Ramzi bin al-Shibh is said to have signed up for the hijackings, only to fail in his attempt to procure a U.S. visa. He carried out, supposedly, other assignments for the brothers.

What mood the country, and the world, will be in to hear the charges is something we may not know for a while. There’s an abstract quality to the setting in which the proceedings will be held. So many accusations about American policy and behavior in the Iraq war have for so long filled the air that portraying the United States as innocent victim of unprovoked attack may be less easy than it seemed back when Khalid & Co. were first hauled in and the snaring of Osama bin Laden himself seemed imminent — or anyway not out of the question.

Corrosive Western anti-Westernism has been at work for a long time, dulling the thirst for justice, posing a false equivalence between victims here and victims elsewhere in the twilight war on terror. “Can’t we all just get along?” is the refrain of many, many Americans and, especially, Europeans.

The Bush administration’s ponderousness in not managing sooner to bring the captives to justice has its match in the carping of politicians and opinion page experts about waterboarding, “torture” and conditions at Guantanamo, as well as the precariousness of efforts to assure dear Khalid and the rest fair trials. None of which is beneath notice. None of which deserves centrality in considering how — and whether — we’re to punish the alleged perpetrators of the worst act of barbarity ever carried out on American soil.

How do we do this thing and keep the Iraq war out of it? And George W. Bush? And Don Rumsfeld? And Condoleezza Rice? It’s certainly not doable in any complete sense. Even insulated from the civilian court system, the military tribunal charged with trying the six can’t consider itself as operating on the slopes of Olympus, where never is seen a protest march or an incendiary posting on a left-wing blog. Certainly not with a presidential campaign under way.

And yet it has to be done — even if done poorly (though clearly that’s not what we want). Too many people may be watching, yes — among them terrorists abroad, looking for every sign of moral slippage or confusion on America’s part. And planning how to exploit that slippage, that confusion.

A nation unwilling — or afraid? — to punish its enemies firmly and resolutely, and in accordance with their deserts, is a nation with problems that need defining; say, in a presidential election.

Listening to the candidates, as the proceedings go forth, could be instructive. I think we all know John McCain — despite past riffs on waterboarding — won’t nudge the electorate toward guilt for America’s attempt to bring national enemies to justice.

Hillary Clinton? Barack Obama? We’ll be listening carefully.

And what about death-penalty foes who suppose you can murder 3,000 people and still qualify for lifetime room and board at state expense?

Yes, we’ll be learning a lot about ourselves. Possibly too much.

William Murchison is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide