- The Washington Times - Sunday, February 17, 2008

Tomorrow is President’s Day, so it’s an appropriate time to see who has a good handle on national history or government. If you think, however, the nation’s college students have the most knowledge about the subjects, think again.

College freshmen earned an average grade of ‘F’ — or just 53.7 percent — when asked a series of questions about U.S. presidents and key historical events from their times in office. After four years of college, their knowledge didn’t improve.

College seniors got just 55.4 percent on the 60-question quiz given to 14,000 students at 50 colleges and universities around the country as part of a study designed to test their knowledge of America’s history, government, international relations and market economy.

“In this election, we are focusing on the youth vote, and it’s great that more kids are coming out to vote. But we worry that it’s become a kind of cult of personality,” says Richard Brake, director of the Lehrman American Studies Center at the Intercollegiate Studies Institute in Wilmington, Del., which commissioned the civic learning study, conducted by researchers at the University of Connecticut’s Department of Public Policy.

“If these kids don’t know what has happened in the past, our history, then we fear they are going to be fodder for sweeping rhetoric,” said Mr. Brake, a former professor who taught American history and government for seven years.

If they don’t have better civic knowledge, he added, “You know that these kids are unprepared to be able to make those more mature judgments and critiques of our system.”

The study, “Failing Our Students, Failing America,” was the second of its kind from ISI. It was first completed in 2005 and then repeated in the fall of 2006. It surveyed students at elite institutions as well as small and public schools, asking questions about such the Constitution, the Civil War, the New Deal, the Cuban Missile crisis.

It found that Harvard University seniors did best, with a grade of just 69.6 percent — a D-plus. In general, the higher a college ranked on the widely publicized U.S. News & World Report rankings, the lower it ranked on civic learning. In schools such as Cornell, Duke, Yale and Princeton, all ranked in the magazine’s top 12, seniors actually did worse than freshman.

Why should anyone care? Because of the global diplomatic climate, nation’s future remains at stake, Mr. Brake argues.

“A clear trend from these results is that American undergraduates know very little about the crucial moments and competing visions of American foreign policy,” he said.”That is deeply troubling, especially for a nation currently at war and struggling to determine its proper role on the world stage.”

Worse still, colleges and universities are not extending the hand of democracy to foreign students who attend U.S. schools. They end up learning “nothing” about our national history and its key institutions, the report said, noting that “colleges thus squander an opportunity to foster greater understanding of America’s institutions in an increasingly hostile world.”

Winfield Myers, a former history professor who co-founded the nonprofit Democracy Project, a foundation designed to improve the nation’s civic responsibility and understanding, blames the problem of civic understanding on the way teachers are educated in colleges of education.

“Rather than being taught the meat of a discipline, be it history or political science, they are taught methodologies of how to teach,” said Mr. Myers, who now leads Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum. “This methodological madness would weaken a subject even if it was offered in a non-politicized way. But it’s not, because colleges of education, drawing as they do on avant-garde theory in their effort to appear cutting edge, are among the most highly politicized branches of the university.”

Mr. Myers said these colleges tend to downplay the accomplishments of Western civilization and “exaggerate its vices to elevate marginal figures to the center of study while ignoring altogether or misrepresenting those who truly changed the past in an effort to right past wrongs committed against women and minorities. So children in K-12 tend to be exposed not to solid history and civics, but to some of the most politicized thought in academe.”

Higher education, however, is not solely to blame, Mr. Brake said. Students in kindergarten through their senior years in high school receive increasingly less civic training, as many public school districts focus on improving scores in math and science, which have lagged against other countries around the world.

College curriculums also have broadened, even at small schools, and students are no longer required to take a prescribed set of foundational or core courses, leaving many to graduate with few courses related to government and history, Mr. Brake said.

“What we would really want is for a university to have a notion of itself and a confidence to say ‘we are the adults here’ and there are certain things that you have to take to be an adult in our society,” Mr. Brake said. “We should also try to improve the teaching of American history and government.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide