- The Washington Times - Friday, February 29, 2008


The New York Times printed an unsourced story that in 2000 when John McCain ran for the presidency he had what some aides supposedly regarded as a romance with a female lobbyist. McCain associates regarded the story as a hit piece. Mr. McCain himself, in denying the story, said he was disappointed in the Times.

In fact, Mr. McCain can be thankful the story first appeared in the Times, which, by the way, stands by the story but offers no persuasive supporting evidence. That is because conservatives, whom Mr. McCain needs to win in November, hate the New York Times. Most don’t just hate the Times, they loathe that newspaper. They are disinclined to believe anything printed in it.

Conservative and Republican dislike for the media is nothing new. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, no conservative or partisan Republican, was startled when, in addressing the GOP Convention more than 40 years ago, he had a throwaway line about not believing or taking direction from columnists and pundits who did not wish the Republican Party well. The Convention erupted in such spontaneity that Eisenhower almost didn’t recognize what he had said.

That was nothing compared with what Barry Goldwater said during his acceptance speech at the 1964 Republican Convention. There was a near riot when he gave it to the media. And that has been a consistent theme at Republican conventions ever since. If the nominee himself did not attack the media, someone else, perhaps a former candidate or a governor, would let the media know that media bias and agenda are not appreciated.

The question for the New York Times: If it had similar information about a liberal candidate for the presidency, would the paper print the same information without a source it could quote? A Washington, D.C., news/talk radio station spent an hour examining the Times’ motives in printing the story. The moderator took about 20 calls. Every call proposed a different motivation.

Regardless of the motivation, Mr. McCain can be thankful that the story originated in the Times and not in the Arizona Republic or the Indianapolis Star. Had those papers printed the story first, some people might have been inclined to believe the story. As it is, even many of McCain critics have come to his defense. And the senator has used his fight against the Times for fund-raising purposes. Given the feelings toward the Times, it would not be surprising if he reaped a huge profit from this episode.

The motto of the New York Times is “All the News that’s Fit to Print.” This story clearly was not a story that was fit to print.

Even Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post waited to be sure they had their stories on Richard Nixon pinned down before they went to press. Editor Ben Bradley insisted on it. Where was the editor of the New York Times when he should have been asking whether this story was fit to print?

Perhaps the McCain battle against the Times will cause other newsroom editors to take a step backward and examine the credibility of a story the next time a similar issue arises.

Paul M. Weyrich is chairman and chief executive officer of the Free Congress Foundation.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide