- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 4, 2008

A self-identified African-American caller to a Washington, D.C., radio station characterized the recent anti-Hillary Clinton outburst by the Chicago white liberal Catholic priest, the Rev. Michael Pfleger, as a “minstrel show.”

Father Pfleger, who was preaching “another gospel,” which the authentic Gospel warns against, denounced Sen. Clinton for her effrontery and sense of “entitlement” in trying to take the Democratic presidential nomination from a black man, one Barack Obama. Father Pfleger, who donated $1,500 to the Obama campaign between 1995 and 2001, is indebted to Mr. Obama because when Mr. Obama was in the Illinois legislature, he, according to the Chicago Tribune, “announced $225,000 in grants to St. Sabina programs.” Three months after the grant was announced, Father Pfleger donated another $200 to Mr. Obama.

Mr. Obama denounced Father Pfleger’s comments far more quickly than he separated himself from his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but one is known by one’s preferred associations. Mr. Obama’s friends and associates have a long history of far-left political and theological positions with which Mr. Obama has appeared perfectly comfortable. It makes one wonder if Mr. Obama’s denunciations are sincere or if he’s had a politically convenient “conversion.” On Saturday, in what might be considered spiritual and political damage control, Mr. Obama announced he has resigned his membership in Trinity United Church of Christ.

We have seen conservative preachers and other self-anointed spokesmen for God make fools of themselves by overindulging in politics and other trivialities and now the theological left is getting its chance to rush in where even angels fear to tread for their equal time and deserved mockery. As I watched the video of Father Pfleger (and Rev. Wright before him), I felt a profound sadness for the congregation, whose members might be enjoying the political equivalent of foreplay but are being denied preaching that would turn their eyes to another Kingdom and another King that could do them far more good than a politician of any color or philosophy.

Shakey’s Pizza restaurants used to have among its signs: “Shakey made a deal with the bank. Shakey doesn’t cash checks. The bank doesn’t make pizza.” That is the kind of deal congregations should demand from their politicians and pastors. Politicians shouldn’t do religion and preachers should stay out of partisan politics.

If preachers want to do politics, they should resign their ordination and become politicians. And if politicians want to do religion, they should stop running for positions in the lower kingdom, enroll in seminary and become ministers in the Higher Kingdom.

The pastor at my church doesn’t do politics. The closest he gets is to pray for the national leadership, as Scripture commands. And before you ask, yes, he did it during all eight years of the Clinton administration. Preaching on politics would divide our congregation, which includes Democrats, Republicans and Independents.

Besides, what’s the point of listening to a political sermon, as if most of us do not already have well-established points of view? We don’t need a clergyman to tell us how to vote. We need a clergyman to reveal God to us. If I want politics on Sunday morning, I can stay home and watch the morning interview shows.

Sen. Charles Grassley, Iowa Republican, is investigating “prosperity gospel” preachers who claim you can live like kings if you’ll send them money, thus allowing to live like kings. One can argue whether government ought to insert itself into doctrinal issues to save the biblically illiterate from their gullibility. But the Internal Revenue Service must investigate Trinity United Church of Christ to determine whether it has violated its tax-exempt status by allowing its pulpit to be used for political purposes.

God can judge the quality of the preaching at Trinity. The IRS should step in and judge the quality of the politics. If Father Pfleger’s superior, Francis Cardinal George, won’t go beyond a statement criticizing his inflammatory and bigoted remarks, Pope Benedict XVI should consider disciplinary action.

As for Mr. Obama’s resignation, he must still explain how he could sit in the church for two decades and be indifferent to such inflammatory rhetoric.

Cal Thomas is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide