- The Washington Times - Sunday, June 8, 2008


Sixty-four years ago last week, President Frank-lin Delano Roosevelt came on the radio and implored Americans to “devote themselves in a continuance of prayer… invoking Thy help to our efforts.” The “effort” of which he spoke was “Operation Overlord,” the “D-Day” landing of 150,000 American and Allied troops at Normandy.

The risks were so great that Winston Churchill told the people of Britain that, “the invasion has been launched. The result is with God.” Roosevelt described it as “a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.”

Since then, those who fought their way ashore on June 6, 1944, and successfully breached Adolf Hitler’s “Atlantic Wall” have been justifiably honored for their participation in the momentous event. On the 40th anniversary of the operation, Ronald Reagan stood on that “lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France,” and spoke of that “giant undertaking unparalleled in human history,” and praised “the boys of Pointe du Hoc… the heroes who helped end a war.”

But that was then - and this is now. This year, the anniversary of their achievement received little notice in the so-called mainstream media. Perhaps that’s because it would draw uncomfortable parallels between those who stormed the coast of France in 1944 and those now fighting - and winning - a war against radical Islam.

Unlike those who braved their way into Hitler’s “Fortress Europe,” the young Americans fighting today’s battles reap few accolades from the potentates of the press or the liberal “leadership” in Washington, D.C.

Last month, Washington state’s Democratic Rep. Jim McDermott described those now serving in our Armed Forces as “mercenaries” and claimed “we’re buying them now.” Apparently, taking a page from Sen. John Kerry’s 2004 “Presidential Campaign Playbook,” Mr. McDermott believes the young Americans winning this generation’s war are those who could not get jobs or get into school. Mr. McDermott you may recall, was once willing to negotiate - without preconditions - with Saddam Hussein. He is now co-sponsoring legislation to require compulsory military conscription.

Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa Democrat, who has asserted false claims of flying combat missions in Vietnam, routinely denigrates many of those serving in today’s all-volunteer military. Two weeks ago, in attacking Sen. John McCain, Mr. Harkin observed that, “It’s one thing to have been drafted and served, but another thing when you come from generations of military people and that’s just how you’re steeped, how you’ve learned, how you’ve grown up.”

All this amplifies a steady - and unfortunately unanswered - chorus from the far left that the U.S. military has been sent on “Mission Impossible” by the Bush administration. That refrain began when House Majority Whip James Clyburn, South Carolina Democrat, confessed last year that if the surge turned out to be a success, it would be “a real problem for us.” By December, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, had entered the echo chamber and began asserting - despite all evidence to the contrary - that “the surge hasn’t accomplished its goals.”

Mr. Reid’s unwillingness to acknowledge the success of our troops is amplified by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In a recent interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, Mrs. Pelosi declared that while “some” progress is being made, it is because of “the goodwill of the Iranians. They decided in Basra when the fighting would end, they negotiated that cessation of hostilities - the Iranians.” Hopefully, she had someone on her staff send the theocrats in Tehran a box of chocolates and a “thank-you” note.

Those who persist in spreading a diatribe of disaster, and who insist on denigrating the brightest, best educated, trained, led and equipped military force in the world, have built a significant following. The facts on the ground, however, simply don’t support their thesis.

In Iraq, Af-ghanistan, the Horn of Africa, and the Philippines - the war against radical Islamic terror is being won by the finest military force the world has ever seen.

Even the editors of a liberal newspaper such as The Washington Post have finally conceded this reality. A recent Post editorial baldly warned about Iraq: “Don’t look now, but the U.S.-backed government and army may be winning the war” and took to task those who comprise “the ‘this-war-is-lost’ caucus.” And last week, the foreign minister of the oil-rich United Arab Emirates visited the Iraqi capital for discussions on reopening their embassy in Baghdad.

The victories over al Qaeda and the Shi’ite Militias in Iraq, against the Taliban and Osama’s remnant in Af-ghanistan, and over Muslim terrorists in Somalia and the Philippines have been won by U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen, Guardsmen and Marines - and the new allies they have advised and trained in these countries.

Those who landed on the beaches of Normandy 64 years ago were American heroes. So are those who serve today.

Oliver North, a nationally syndicated columnist, is the host of “War Stories” on the Fox News Channel and author of “American Heroes.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide