- The Washington Times - Saturday, November 22, 2008


In last Sunday’s American Profile article “Choosing a Bicycle,” Mari S. Gold offers sound advice about buying a bicycle and recommends the misnamed “hybrid” bicycle for cyclists who want a versatile vehicle. A true hybrid would have been the offspring of two different “species” of parents, in this case the mountain bike and road bike. However, these particular “hybrids” were around long before their “ancestors,” in the form of the stylish lightweight bicycles — featuring three-to-10 speeds, comfortable seats, fenders and chain-guards — that we all rode in the 1950s and ‘60s.

In the ‘70s and ‘80s manufacturers foisted impractical and uncomfortable mountain and racing bikes upon the general public, and the more practical lightweights vanished from the streets. The more knowledgeable, European cyclists are mystified by Americans’ faddish choice of ugly and uncomfortable specialty bicycles for everyday use. Give me a ‘60s bike any day, but don’t double its price and call it a “hybrid.”



Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide