- The Washington Times - Saturday, November 29, 2008

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Barack Obama has succeeded where Hillary Clinton failed. She hoped to win a third Clinton term, but it is her vanquisher who is reconstituting the Clinton administration.

Mr. Obama’s just-named nominee for treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, served under Clinton Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. Mr. Summers himself is Mr. Obama’s choice to head the National Economic Council. Both are part of Mr. Rubin’s circle, known for its brains and its relative moderation.

Few would have guessed back when Mr. Obama rose from the snows of Iowa that highly experienced economic technicians would represent “change we can believe in.” Thankfully, Mr. Obama’s airy rhetoric about a new kind of politics was more a pitch for impressionable new voters than a description of his governing style.

So far, President-elect Obama has acted with a ruthless pragmatism. He ignored the yowling left-wing blogosphere when it demanded Joe Lieberman’s head, turned (reportedly) to the initially pro-Iraq War Hillary Clinton for his top foreign-policy job, and staffed up with former Clintonites. Mr. Obama has been a shape-shifter throughout his brief political career, and the latest shape — an establishment Democrat determined to do whatever works — is the best version yet.

Mr. Obama appears to be reconsidering for now his promised repeal of President Bush’s “tax cuts for the rich.” Twice during the primaries, Mr. Obama hinted he might put off the tax increases if the economy were in distress, but he could never admit what was obvious: Proposing tax increases in the teeth of a recession was madness.

We are entering one of those periodic cycles when liberals have to bless rather than dump on a profitable private sector, because without it there’s no way for Mr. Obama to meet his pledge of creating or — in his elastic term — “saving” 2.5 million jobs. One of Bill Clinton’s most valuable insights was that a favorable business climate fostering economic growth trumped any government jobs program.

If Mr. Obama is wise, he’ll not only jettison his plans for a tax increase that in aiming at the rich would also hit successful small businesses, but also will put off his plans for a “cap-and-trade” program to tax the use of fossil fuels, forswear all his protectionist sentiments from the primaries, and ditch his support for a “card check” plan to promote the unionization of the American work force. Anything that burdens business should be anathema to Dr. Fix-the-Economy.

For now, the showpiece of Mr. Obama’s economic program is a massive stimulus bill that the Democratic Congress wants to have ready for his signature as soon as he departs the Capitol Hill steps after his Inauguration. Even some conservative economists believe a fiscal stimulus is necessary to keep us out of a deflationary spiral, but Mr. Obama is only asking a Democratic Congress — given to fiscal incontinence even in rosy economic circumstances — to do what comes naturally.

In contrast, Bill Clinton ratcheted down his spending plans upon first taking office, under the influence of the very Robert Rubin who is the mentor of Mr. Geithner, et al. Circumstances have changed, and so have the views of the Rubinites, who aren’t the fiscal hawks they were in the 1990s.

The current crisis is yet another indication that a Rubinite article of faith - that the budget deficit basically determines interest rates - is false. The deficit is soaring toward $1 trillion or more while interest rates scrape bottom.

We can’t know what new twists the crisis will take (the latest financial institution in need of rescue is Robert Rubin’s Citigroup). We do know Mr. Obama will need more than a ruthless pragmatism to navigate through it. In his masterly “The Great Inflation and Its Aftermath,” Robert Samuelson chronicles the extraordinary stalwartness of Ronald Reagan when he allowed Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker to squeeze inflation painfully out of the economic system during the last time of a downturn this severe, in 1981-‘82.

That took guts. Mr. Obama will need them as well, and they won’t be on loan from any adviser, no matter what his pedigree.

Rich Lowry is a nationally syndicated columnist.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide