- The Washington Times - Wednesday, September 24, 2008


We are almost always in agreement with Thomas Sowell (“Idols and Crowds,” Web, Commentary, Saturday). However, his views on the possibility of Iran attacking Israel are misplaced for the following reasons:

1) Islam’s third-holiest site - the al-Aqsa Mosque, including the Dome of the Rock - is in Jerusalem, and therefore, Iran would not seek its destruction. Remember that the entire country of Israel is smaller than New Jersey. Even a nuclear bomb dropped on Haifa - the biggest city in northern Israel - would mean disaster for Jerusalem; 2) A nuclear attack by Iran would mean nuclear retaliation by Israel, the United States and its allies; 3) Iran has yet to pre-emptively attack another nation. So, contrary to the rhetoric, Iran will not attack Israel, with or without nuclear weapons.


Los Angeles

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide