- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 25, 2008

VIENNA, Austria

Two years? One? Even less?

Opinions differ on how close Iran may be to developing a nuclear weapon, but concerned governments and experts agree the time to stop Tehran is growing short - and the options are limited.

The time frame is increasingly important because of the possibility that Israel or the United States might opt for a military strike against the Islamic republic if either judged that all diplomatic options to end its nuclear defiance had been exhausted.

Also, with Tehran showing no signs of giving up uranium enrichment or heeding other international demands, the diplomatic window is growing increasingly narrow.

That fact gives special significance to a meeting this week of the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its chief focus of what to do about Iran.

Hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made his annual appearance in New York at the U.N. General Assembly this week, where he told fellow heads of state on Tuesday that Iran has an “inalienable right” to produce nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes.

Mr. Ahmadinejad also appeared to stoke the flames on Sunday, declaring that Iran’s military will “break the hand” of anyone targeting his country’s nuclear facilities. He spoke during a military parade displaying various types of Iranian-made missiles. Also in the parade was a military truck carrying a huge banner saying, “Israel should be eliminated from the universe” in both English and Farsi.

Iran insists its nuclear activities are geared only toward generating power, but Israel says the Islamic republic could have enough nuclear material to make its first bomb within a year. The European Union warned Wednesday that Iran is nearing the ability to arm a nuclear warhead, but the United States estimates that Tehran is still at least two years away from that stage.

At the low end is physicist and former U.N. nuclear inspector David Albright. He says Tehran could reach weapons capacity in as little as six months through uranium enrichment.

An IAEA report drawn up for the IAEA board meeting says Tehran has increased the number of centrifuges used to process uranium to nearly 4,000 from 3,000 just a few months ago.

Mr. Albright, whose Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security closely tracks suspect secret proliferators, also has been able to extrapolate other information from the report that is less obvious but of at least equal concern.

Iran, he says, has managed to iron out most of the bugs in the intensely complicated process of enrichment that often saw the centrifuges breaking down. The machines, he says, “now appear to be running at approximately 85 percent of their stated target capacity, a significant increase over previous rates.”

That, he says means they can produce more enriched uranium faster. Though the IAEA says the machines so far have spewed out only low-enriched material suitable solely for nuclear fuel, producing enough of that can make it easy to “break out” quickly by reprocessing it to weapons-grade uranium suitable for the fissile core of a warhead.

To date, Iran has produced nearly 1,000 pounds of low-enriched uranium, the report says - close to the 1,500-pound minimum Mr. Albright says is needed to produce the 45 to 60 pounds needed for a simple nuclear bomb under optimal conditions.

With Iran’s centrifuges running ever more smoothly, it “is progressing toward this capability and can be expected to reach it in six months to two years,” Mr. Albright said.

Additional work - making a crude bomb to contain the uranium - would take no more than “several months,” he said.

That work could be done secretly and consecutively with the last stages of weapons-grade enrichment. With Iran limiting access of IAEA inspectors to facilities it has declared to the agency, the U.N. nuclear monitor is blindsided in efforts to establish whether such covert atomic work is going on.

Iran insists it is an innocent victim of U.S. pressure. However, international concern has grown enough to result in three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions over the past two years. Also, Iranian stonewalling of IAEA inspectors probing claims that it actively tried to modify a missile to carry a nuclear payload and conducted other weapons-related research has added to fears.

The IAEA report prepared for the board meeting starting Monday faulted Iran for blocking efforts to further investigate the suspicions, based on intelligence from the United States and several other IAEA member nations.

Part of the report spoke of what appeared to be drawings and calculations by Iranian engineers on reconfiguring its Shahab-3 missile to be able to carry a nuclear payload.

Iranian officials say the missile has a range of 1,250 miles, enabling a strike on Israel and most of the Middle East.

Such reports stoke Israeli fears and may force the Jewish state’s hand.

Beyond veiled warnings from Israeli leaders of a possible last-resort strike, the country is building its capacities with weapons that could spearhead such action.

It has purchased 90 F-16I fighter planes, which can carry enough fuel to reach Iran, and it will receive 11 more by the end of next year. It has bought two new Dolphin submarines from Germany reportedly capable of firing nuclear-armed warheads - in addition to the three it already has.

This summer it carried out air maneuvers in the Mediterranean that touched off an international debate over whether they were a “dress rehearsal” for an imminent attack, a stern warning to Iran or a just a way to get allies to step up the pressure on Tehran to stop building nukes.

Former Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh told AP on Sunday that “the military option for Israel is the last resort.”

Still, those now in power leave no doubt that it remains on the table.

“If Israeli, U.S., or European intelligence gets proof that Iran has succeeded in developing nuclear weapons technology, then Israel will respond in a manner reflecting the existential threat posed by such a weapon,” Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz said recently.

• Associated Press writer Nasser Karimi contributed to this report from Tehran.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide