- The Washington Times - Saturday, September 27, 2008




Neither of our would-be leaders covered himself in glory during the last week. A financial crisis (and for once the word “crisis” is apt) has opened beneath our feet, threatening to swallow God only knows how much of our prosperity in its maw, and the two candidates were unable to see beyond their own narrow political interests and unable to resist searching for effigies to burn.

John McCain’s posture should have been obvious: He should have presented himself as the perspicacious statesman who had foreseen the trouble and warned against it. In 2006, Mr. McCain had called for more stringent oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose failures underlie today’s unraveling. In a press release at the time Mr. McCain declared, “If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.” He should then have outlined the kind of reforms he would undertake to prevent this from happening in the future. Had he done this, in tones more in sorrow than anger, he would have been able to reinforce his “reform” credentials without seeming opportunistic or rattled.

As it is, Mr. McCain lashed out at Wall Street: “Americans are hurting right now and there’s going to be a ripple effect of this financial crisis because of the greed and corruption and excess - and Wall Street treated the American economy like a casino.” He then recommended the firing of Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Chris Cox, one of the smartest and most able officials in the U.S. government, be fired. Perhaps Mr. Cox has made mistakes - who hasn’t? - but the notion he is responsible for this mess is, to say no more, a stretch. Instead of looking decisive, Mr. McCain looked petty by singling him out. He would have been better advised to aim his fire at Democrats in Congress who declined to regulate Fannie and Freddie adequately because they favored making questionable loans to so-called “underserved” populations.

A bill to more strictly regulate the mortgage giants passed the Senate Banking Committee in 2005. But as Kevin Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute explains, “Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote.”

Wall Street, whether Mr. McCain likes it or not, is identified in the public mind with Republicans (though, as the Center for Responsive Politics reports, the finance, insurance and real estate industries gave more contributions to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama earlier this year than to John McCain).

Still the perception endures that Republicans are the party of the rich. Railing against “greed and corruption” won’t get Mr. McCain very far. But pointing up the Democrats’ role — their cozy public/private partnerships, the multimillions made by Democrat bigwigs like Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson and Jamie Gorelick — would certainly confound the image the Obama campaign is trying to paint.

As for Mr. Obama, he has used the financial crisis as the pinup for Republican approaches to the economy generally, proof he says that “too many folks in Washington and on Wall Street weren’t minding the store” and plucked a couple of McCain quotes out of context for good measure. Mr. Obama heaped scorn on Mr. McCain’s comment that the “fundamentals of the economy are strong,” omitting the next words, which were “but these are very, very difficult times.”

Mr. Obama (remember him? the fellow who was going to run a different kind of campaign?) also trotted out Mr. McCain’s old quote “I’m always for less regulation” without clarifying that Mr. McCain had specifically called for more regulation of Fannie and Freddie, the two quasi-governmental entities at the heart of the current meltdown.

Mr. Obama seems to have dropped any pretense to running an honest campaign. Virtually all his charges against Mr. McCain now dabble in deception. Noting that Mr. McCain wants to increase competition in the health-care insurance market, Mr. Obama says, “So let me get this straight - he wants to run health care like they’ve been running Wall Street.”

Now let me get this straight: the subprime mortgage disaster, created in Washington by politicians who wanted to increase homeownership and, yes, perpetuated by unwise gambling in the financial markets undermines the validity of competition? It really makes you wonder, when Mr. Obama invites voters to fire the “whole trickle-down, on-your-own, look-the-other-way crowd in Washington who [have] led us down this disastrous path” whether he really means capitalism itself.

Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide