- The Washington Times - Sunday, September 7, 2008

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

I am sick of hearing people refer to America’s “oil addiction.” The word addiction refers to the abuse of a harmful and dangerous substance. There’s nothing harmful and dangerous about oil. It’s literally the lifeblood of civilization. Most of us would die without the fuel and energy required by oil. The rest of us would (at best) be living in unimaginable economic squalor.

To say that we should move beyond oil is simply to imply the obvious: that human innovation should continue. Yet the people who oppose Big Oil the loudest (i.e., the politicians) are the ones most in favor of restraining capitalism and innovation in science. If government got out of the way, and if reason and science were elevated to the status they deserve in human affairs, we could once again be certain that human innovation would rise to the occasion, moving us ever further along.

Let’s not forget, though: Oil is nothing more than sticky muck found in the ground without the rational mind-set underlying all human innovation. I’m grateful for the presence of oil in the world, insofar as human ingenuity made it useful. It has served all of us pretty well. Human use of oil is not some abusive addiction. It’s the whole reason our lives are as worthwhile as they are.

MICHAEL J. HURD

Rehoboth Beach, Del.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide