- The Washington Times - Monday, August 10, 2009

For years, the Bush administration was criticized for not cleaning up enough of the nation’s most contaminated waste sites. The Obama administration plans to do even less.

Environmental groups and some Democratic lawmakers railed against President George W. Bush’s cleanup record. But this time, they’re shying away from speaking out against a president who’s considered an ally in the fight to clean up the environment.

The Environmental Protection Agency expects in Mr. Obama’s first two years in office to begin the final phase of cleanup at fewer Superfund sites than in any administration since 1991, according to budget documents and agency records. The EPA estimates it will finish construction to remove the last traces of pollution at 20 sites in 2009 and 22 sites in 2010.

During the eight years of the Bush administration, the agency finished construction at 38 sites on average a year.

“Certainly, we are very disappointed that we can’t get our … numbers up,” said Elizabeth Southerland, the acting deputy of the EPA’s hazardous-waste cleanup program, known as Superfund.

The explanation by the Obama team is the same one put forward time and time again by Bush officials: The sites on the list have become increasingly complicated, contaminated and costly. That means it takes years for sites to reach the final cleanup stage, and as a result fewer are getting there.

Of the 527 contaminated properties still needing cleanup on the Superfund list, 40 have progressed to the point where all that’s left is removing the last piles of contaminated soil, building a treatment plant to strip the groundwater of toxic pollutants, or capping a landfill so contamination does not enter the drinking water or air in surrounding neighborhoods.

At the other 1,060 hazardous-waste sites still on the list, construction is finished and the last stages of the cleanup are under way - a process begun before Mr. Obama took office.

When EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson explained this trend to a Senate committee this year, Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, replied: “That’s the same answer the Bush administration gave us, and I don’t buy it.”

Later, in an interview with the Associated Press, Ms. Boxer elaborated. “It doesn’t matter to me who the president is. What matters to me is these sites get cleaned up,” she said.

But not everyone is so critical of Mr. Obama’s Superfund numbers.

Environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and some Democratic lawmakers who highlighted how little the Bush administration supposedly did on hazardous-waste cleanups are now silent. They say it’s because Mr. Obama, unlike Mr. Bush, wants to address the problem that has plagued Superfund for years - a lack of money.

A tax on petroleum, chemicals and large companies once helped EPA pay for the multimillion-dollar cleanups. It expired in 1995, and Superfund has been on financial life-support since.

The pool of money ran dry in 2004, when Superfund cleanups that did not have a company to foot the bill ceased to be subsidized by the tax on polluters and started being paid by taxpayers.

Mr.Obama, unlike Mr. Bush, has called for the reinstatement of the tax in 2011. That will require action by Congress. It will also be up to Congress to set aside more money for cleanups if the tax is reinstated. In the past, when Superfund was flush in cash from the tax, Congress did not always provide more money for cleanups.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide