- The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 26, 2009


Robert E. Moffit’s Op-Ed column “Government a health hazard?” (Opinion, Friday) inadequately conveys information that is important to physicians in the health reform debate. The fact is that about $250 billion of the House bill’s provisions would enhance access to care through physician-focused improvements. These include permanent repeal of the Medicare physician payment formula and payment increases for primary care and rural and underserved areas. Other improvements include increased coverage for preventive care and increased funding for and flexibility in physician work-force programs.

Mr. Moffit is behind the times and relying on a flawed analysis conducted by a wholly owned subsidy of an insurance company. The House Energy and Commerce Committee already has made important, American Medical Association-supported changes to the bill that would guarantee voluntary participation and allow physicians to negotiate payment rates in the public option.

Everyone needs to have health insurance, and Congress is still working out the details of how to accomplish this.



American Medical Association


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide