- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 27, 2009


“Take my mother-in-law - please,” isn’t a joke you’re likely to hear often these days fromSunda Croon quist. The veteran comic is being sued by her mother-in-law after making her the punch line of too many jokes.

The mother-in-law is accusing Miss Croonquist of spreading false, defamatory and racist lies with in-law jokes that have become a staple of the comic’s routine in nightclubs and on television channels, including Comedy Central.

To Miss Croonquist, the in-law jokes seemed like naturals after she lived through one comical culture-clash moment after another: She is half-black, half-Swedish, grew up Roman Catholic and married into a Jewish family.

And she’s not shy about making the in-laws the butt of her jokes.

Take the one about her mother-in-law’s reaction to news she was pregnant with her first child: “OK, now that we know you’re having a little girl, I want to know what you’re naming that little tchotchke. Now we don’t want a name that’s difficult to pronounce like Shaniqua. We’re thinking a name short but delicious. Like Hadassah or Goldie.”

Or her first visit to her mother-in-law’s house: “I walk in, I say, ‘Thank you so much for having me here, Ruthie.’ She says, ‘The pleasure’s all mine; have a seat.’ Then, in a loud aside, ‘Harriet, put my pocketbook away.’ ”

Miss Croonquist says there was a time when her in-laws would laugh with everyone else at the black-member-of-a-Jewish-family jokes. “They played my tape at Passover one year, and they loved it!” she says.

Things changed, however, after Miss Croonquist, promoting upcoming gigs in New Jersey, posted information on her Web site that her in-laws said enabled pretty much anyone to figure out their identities.

They sued in April in U.S. District Court in New Jersey, where they live. The action seeks unspecified damages and demands that Miss Croonquist remove any offensive statements from her Web site, routines and recordings.

Miss Croonquist says she would drop any language her family finds offensive, but she refuses to pay any settlement. Her lawyer has filed a motion to have the suit dismissed, and a judge is scheduled to hear it on Sept. 8.

In the meantime, Miss Croonquist, who lives in Beverly Hills and is a regular on the Hollywood comedy circuit, was at the Laugh Factory on open-mic night recently, eager to test some new non-mother-in-law material. This time the butt of her jokes would be herself, her lawyer husband (his firm is representing her in the lawsuit) and entertainer Jennifer Lopez.

“My father is Swedish, my mother is African-American. You know what that made me growing up?” she asks the audience. “A Puerto Rican! That works for me, honey. … After having two babies in two years, I look like J.Lo.”

Still, she couldn’t resist getting a few yuks out of her in-laws, although this time she left their first names out of the act.

Imitating her sister-in-law during their first meeting (and in a New Jersey accent, the lawsuit notes) Miss Croonquist has made sounds “like a cat in heat”: “Oh my Gawd, look at her, she’s got light eyes and light hair. What kind of black person is she?”

Then herself (in a black urban street voice): “I said, ‘A black person who can hear, that’s who.’ ”

Then (as Haley Joel Osment might sound in “The Sixth Sense,” if he spoke in a black urban accent): “I hear white people.”

“They’re nice jokes. There’s nothing bad, nothing defamatory,” says Miss Croonquist, whose own voice carries traces of her upbringing in Paterson, N.J., where she says she was always the cutup in Catholic school.

It should be obvious to her in-laws, she says, that she’s not anti-Jewish. She converted to Judaism before she met her husband, and she keeps a kosher house.

The lawsuit was filed by mother-in-law Ruth Zafrin; her daughter, Shelley Edelman; and Shelley’s husband, Neil. Neither Mrs. Zafrin, the Edelmans nor their attorney, Lawrence H. Wertheim, returned calls for comment.

Attorney Gary L. Bostwick, an expert in First Amendment law who isn’t involved in the case, said suing a comedian is often difficult because courts tend to rule that it should be obvious they are joking.

In one of the most prominent cases, the Rev. Jerry Falwell lost when he sued Hustler magazine in the 1980s for stating in an ad parody that the preacher had lost his virginity to his mother in an outhouse.

“Most people who sue under these kinds of circumstances are way too sensitive,” Mr. Bostwick said. “If they contact a lawyer like me, I would tell them that, without seeing the script and the blog, I have no idea who is right and who is wrong, but I do know there is a very strong defense: It’s very difficult to prove that it was not just a joke.”

Since the lawsuit was filed, Miss Croonquist has bounced back and forth between anger and humor. She’s angry that the action has estranged her husband and their two daughters from his family, noting bitterly, “This could have broken up my marriage.”

Then, moments later, she’s back to laughing about that first mother-in-law meeting, the one that helped launch 15 years of jokes. If she knew then that she was going to be sued, she says, she might have tried to make a worse first impression, perhaps impersonating a gangsta rapper.

“I should have went in with a gold tooth. I should have had like one pant’s leg rolled up. I should have been like, ‘Yo, yo, yo. Shalom, y’all. ‘Sup?’ ” she says, chuckling.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide