- The Washington Times - Friday, December 11, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

David Gratzer’s Op-Ed (“Yet another new entitlement,” Opinion, Sunday) inaccurately portrays the Community Living Assistance Service and Supports (CLASS) plan as an entitlement program, when, in fact, CLASS is a voluntary insurance program funded by participants’ premiums and earned interest, not tax subsidies. The Senate bill specifically prohibits using tax dollars to pay for benefits.

Mr. Gratzer is mistaken in equating CLASS with “Congress’ pay-as-you-go programs” because the bill mandates that CLASS charge premiums sufficient to assure that the program is solvent at least 75 years from day one and is kept that way. The Congressional Budget Office’s analysis shows that the program meets this requirement.

Long-term services and supports are a health care issue that no one wants to talk about and everybody will face. Unlike other programs, CLASS offers a consumer-funded and fiscally solvent way to make it affordable to care.

LARRY MINNIX

President and chief executive officer

American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging

Washington

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide