- The Washington Times - Monday, February 23, 2009

With the first concerted federal program to subsidize high-speed Internet services in rural areas, the new economic stimulus package will create some jobs and could get hundreds of thousands of households online.

Yet there’s some question whether the economy would be more energized by spending that money on other things.

Because Internet access is already widespread and still being expanded even in a shrinking economy, injecting more money for broadband could simply equate to giving more coffee to someone who has already downed three cups.

“From the rural Vermont that we see, broadband is happening, happening fast,” said Michel Guite, president of Vermont Telephone Co., which is based in Springfield.

The company, which serves 21,000 lines, is able to borrow from commercial lenders when it needs to invest in expanding Internet services, Mr. Guite said Thursday at a conference organized by the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information.

Although he wouldn’t decline cheaper loans from the government, Mr. Guite said Congress could help his company better by cutting red tape, particularly when it comes to freeing up spectrum for wireless services.

The stimulus bill provides $7.2 billion for grants, loans and loan guarantees, primarily for areas that lack broadband or are “underserved,” although the term is not defined. Some of that money is set aside to expand Internet access at such public centers as community colleges and public libraries.

One reason the money won’t likely have much impact is its small size: less than 1 percent of the overall stimulus package, and substantially less per citizen than some countries - such as Ireland and Sweden - have spent on improving their networks.

The Obama administration is looking at creating a more comprehensive plan to get the whole country covered by broadband, technology adviser Alec Ross told The Washington Post this week, but it’s not yet clear if that would mean more subsidies.

A possible point of comparison is phone service for rural areas, which has long been subsidized through a program that has critics, too. A study by Robert W. Crandall of the Brookings Institution said that the program produces customer savings of about $2 per month for $20 in monthly subsidies. However, he conceded that when phone service was being built out, subsidies may have helped.

Larry Sarjeant, vice president of legislative affairs at Qwest Communications International Inc., said the Denver-based phone company could use $3 billion to expand Internet access to 2 million households and small businesses in 14 Western states, many of them thinly populated.

Because Qwest is unlikely to get that large a share of the funds, and the number of households that sign up for service will be smaller still, the net effect would be at most a few hundred thousand new Internet subscribers. Qwest added 236,000 broadband subscribers on its own last year.

In 2007 and 2008, the Pew Internet and American Life Project asked households that lacked broadband why they haven’t signed up. Lack of availability was ranked fourth, given by 14 percent. Most answered that they didn’t need the Internet, that it was too expensive or too hard to use. Many people who don’t use the Internet simply don’t have computers.

About 95 percent of households can already get broadband, according to the National Cable & T1elecommunications Association. However, the industry hasn’t been very forthcoming in saying exactly where it’s available, and that’s part of what the stimulus package wants to address - it has allocated $350 million to mapping U.S. broadband access.

There are signs that the money will do at least some good to rural areas.

A study of 3,000 people in Michigan, Texas and Kentucky found those in areas that received broadband Internet grants from the federal Rural Utilities Service quickly signed up for service, matching the penetration rates in cities. That happened where network investment was coupled with community programs aimed at persuading people about the benefits of Internet access.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide