- The Washington Times - Saturday, January 10, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

COMMENTARY:

As if President-elect Barack Obama didn’t have enough waiting for him on his platter at the White House, a new report on juvenile violence offers another flavor for him to chew on: the color of crime.

Remember the backlash he stirred up last year with a speech in a black Chicago church when he criticized absentee fathers and negligent mothers? The Rev. Jesse Jackson and other critics asked why Mr. Obama singled out us black parents when other ethnic groups misbehave, too. A disturbing new report on youth violence offers an answer: Our kids are killing each other more than other ethnic groups’ kids do.

After more than a decade of overall decline in violent crimes, a study of federal crime statistics by Northeastern University criminologists brings on the gloom. It finds the number of homicides involving black male juveniles as victims rose 31 percent and as perpetrators by 43 percent between 2002 and 2007.

During the same period, murders by white youth actually decreased slightly. The FBI statistics on which the study is based don’t count Hispanics separately from whites. Hispanic crime rates are between 3 and 4 times that of whites, according to contributing editor Heather MacDonald in the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal. Counting Hispanics separately from whites, she writes, would make the 10-to-1 disparity between black and white homicide rates reported in the Northeastern study even larger.

The report is particularly depressing in light of the good news to which we have become accustomed since the early 1990s. That’s when crime suddenly dropped, despite some experts’ doomsday predictions of a rise in young “superpredators.”

In fact, one of the experts who predicted a crime rise was James Alan Fox, a Northeastern criminal justice professor who co-authored the new study with Assistant Professor Marc Swatt.

It didn’t take long for one of Mr. Fox’s critics, “Freakonomics” author Steven Levitt, to note in his New York Times blog a glaring omission. The Times coverage and most of Mr. Fox’s report fail to mention a 15 percent rise in the overall population of black youths.

Based on changes in population, the number of perpetrators would have been expected to rise from a little over 800 to nearly 1,000,” writes Mr. Levitt, a University of Chicago economist. “Knowing that,” he writes, “the actual rise to roughly 1,150 doesn’t seem that noteworthy.”

Maybe not, as a mathematical statistic. The families of the victims of those extra 150 youthful perps probably have another view.

“Freakonomics,” you might recall is the best-seller that extrapolated, among other bombshells, that the 1990s crime drop may have resulted from the legalization of abortion in the early 1970s. Other experts have pointed out, among other arguments, that Canada experienced a similar crime drop without a similar change in abortion laws.

Who’s right? After years of reading reports and interviewing experts, I am convinced crime is like the stock market: A lot of people know how it works, but no one can tell you when the next boom or crash will come. But, as a Supreme Court justice once said about pornography, we know it when we see it.

We don’t know if Mr. Fox’s crime surge will continue up or slide down. But we have some pretty good ideas of what works in fighting crime and what doesn’t. We also know we invite another trend in the wrong direction if we don’t do anything.

A big hint of Mr. Fox’s preferred wish list is offered in the title of the report he co-authored: “The Recent Surge in Homicides Involving Young Black Males and Guns: Time to Reinvest in Prevention and Crime Control.” That is something Congress and the incoming Obama administration should keep in mind as they wonder where to spend billions in stimulus dollars.

We can use more federal support for police on the street and other traditional law enforcement funding that was trimmed back during the Bush administration, the Fox report suggests. We could also fight harder to forge right-left coalitions behind tougher prosecution of crimes committed with a gun.

But we black Americans cannot rely on government help alone. Nothing stirs more mischief in young minds and bodies than to have too much time on their hands. The Fox report notes most youth crimes are committed after school and before evening. That’s why Mr. Obama’s comments last Father’s Day in Chicago’s Apostolic Church urged young parents to fill that empty time with useful activities.

“Obama was merely paying attention to an unavoidable fact that race men are obligated to point out,” Jabari Asim, editor of the Crisis, the NAACP’s magazine, observes in his new book “What Obama Means”: “Where black Americans are concerned, there is always more at stake.”

Despite the naysayers, I think Mr. Obama’s message was welcome. It didn’t hurt his black support on Election Day.

Clarence Page is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide