- The Washington Times - Monday, July 6, 2009

President Obama was supposed to be “cool.” But he isn’t. He’s square. Not just mildly so, but embarrassingly square.

He’s squaresville squared. It’s as if you’re having a party with your friends and he’s the cringe-making middle-aged parent who wants to show he digs where the young people are at by grooving around in the middle of the dance floor all night long.

How do I know? I’ve been there, and I’ve been square. By “there,” I mean I’ve been in places that have tried all the cool Obama dance moves and eventually wised up to what utter clunkers they are.

A week ago, the House of Representatives passed some gargantuan “cap-and-trade” bill designed to “save the environment.” Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, accused those Neanderthals who voted against the bill of committing “treason against the planet.” By that standard, most of the planet is guilty of treason against the planet. I don’t mean just in the sense that China, already the world’s No. 1 carbon dioxide emitter, and India and other rising economic powers have absolutely no intention of doing what the Democrats have done, no way, no how — because they don’t see why they should stay poor just because New York Times columnists think it’s good for them.

No, I mean most of the developed world already has gone down the paved road of good intentions and is frantically trying to pedal up out of it. New Zealand was one of the few Western nations to sign on to Kyoto and then attempt to abide by it — until the New Zealanders realized they could only do so by destroying their economy. They introduced a Democratic-style cap-and-trade regime — and last year they suspended it. In Australia, the Labor government postponed its emissions-reduction program until 2011, and the Aussie Senate may scuttle it. The Obama administration has gotten to the climate-change hop just as the glitter ball has stopped whirling and the band is packing up its instruments.

The congressional cap-and-trade shtick would be tired even if weren’t the familiar boondoggle of tax increases, big-government micro-regulation, and pork-a-palooza payoffs to preferred clients of the Democratic Party.

Granted that carbon credits already were a dubious racket equivalent to the sale of “indulgences” in medieval Europe, the decision by congressional power brokers to give away credits to well-connected Democratic Party interests surely represents the environmental movement’s formal jumping of the endangered great white shark.

Back at the New York Times, Thomas Friedman agreed the bill “stinks” and says “it’s a mess” and he “detests” it but we nevertheless need to pass it because his “gut” tells him so.

Maybe his gut is really telling him the New York Times canteen’s daily specials have been adversely affected by the company’s collapsing share price. Who knows?

At any rate, for reasons not entirely obvious from his prose style, the eminent columnist believes himself to have a special influence on the youth of today and so directed the grand finale of his gut’s analysis to them especially: “Attention all young Americans,” he proclaimed. “You want to make a difference? Then get out of Facebook and into somebody’s face. Get a million people on the Washington Mall calling for a price on carbon.”

Perhaps it’ll work. Getting into Mr. Friedman’s face, I see the ruddy bloom of late middle age has not yet faded from it, so maybe, as his command of the lingo shows, he is hep to the scene. Maybe the kids will abandon their Tweet cred for street cred. Maybe they’ll get outta MySpace and into Sen. Robert C. Byrd’s parking space.

I don’t know how Mr. Friedman defines “young,” but let’s be generous: If you’re 29, there has been no global warming for your entire adult life. If you’re graduating high school, there has been no global warming since you entered first grade. There has been no global warming this century. None.

Admittedly, the 21st century is only one century out of the many centuries of planetary existence, but it happens to be the one you’re stuck living in. Alan Carlin, in a report for the Environmental Protection Racket — whoops, Environmental Protection Agency — that the agency attempted to suppress, says:

“Fossil fuel and cement emissions increased by 3.3 percent per year during 2000-2006, compared to 1.3 percent per year in the 1990s. Similarly, atmospheric C02 concentrations increased by 1.93 parts per million per year during 2000-2006, compared to 1.58 ppm in the 1990s. And yet, despite accelerating emission rates and concentrations, there’s been no net warming in the 21st century, and more accurately, a decline.”

The Obama administration is getting into the global-warming beads and kaftan just as everyone else is beginning to toss ‘em into the recycling bin. Same with government automobiles: Been there, drove that — from Eastern Europe to Northern Ireland.

There’s something weirdly parochial about Mr. Obama, the supposed “citizen of the world.” A recent piece of mine about “the Europeanization of America” prompted Randall Hoven of the American Thinker to respond that this was unfair … to Europeans. He has a point. While the United States is going full throttle for Scandinavia-a-go-go, the Continentals have begun to discern to the limits of Europeanization. In 2007, government spending in Europe averaged 46.2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP); in America it was 37.4 percent, of which 20 percent was federal.

A mere two years later, federal spending is up to 28.5 percent, so, even if state and local spending stand still, we’re at 46 percent - the European average. But, as Mr. Hoven points out, the real story is that we’re at 46 percent and climbing, the Continentals are at 46 percent and heading down.

In 1993, government spending averaged 52.2 percent in Europe, and 70.9 percent in Sweden. The Swedes have reduced government spending (as a fraction of GDP) by almost a third in the last 15 years. Their corporate tax rates are lower than ours. And that’s before Mr. Obama raised them.

Last week, the donut chain Tim Hortons, which operates on both sides of the border but is incorporated in the state of Delaware, announced it was reorganizing itself as a Canadian corporation to take advantage of Canadian tax rates.

“To take advantage of Canadian tax rates”? What kind of cockamamie phrase is that? And who would have thought any columnist south of the border would ever have cause to type it?

The Europeans have figured out that you can be too European for your own good, and they are trying to reacquaint themselves with the real world. Not Mr. Obama. Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead! Male unemployment has hit 10 percent? The stimulus is a bust? It’s stimulating nothing but non-jobs like executive stimulus coordinator for community organization stimulus assistance programs? Hey, let’s spend even more, even faster, even less stimulatingly!

Mr. Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Barney Frank and their chums are spending at a rate that threatens American stability. And, except for the scale and the dollar figure, it all has been tried before, and it all has failed before.

There’s nothing cool about Mr. Obama. He’s a nonstop square dance, swinging us around till we’re dozy and he’s got all the dough.

Mark Steyn is the author of the New York Times best-seller “America Alone.”

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide