- The Washington Times - Thursday, July 16, 2009

With the help of Hollywood, those historic, grainy images of the first men on the moon never looked better. NASA unveiled refurbished video Thursday of the July 20, 1969, moonwalk restored by the same company that sharpened up the movie “Casablanca.”

NASA lost its original moon landing videotapes, and after a three-year search, officials have concluded they probably were erased. That original live video was ghostlike and grainy.

NASA and a Hollywood film restoration company took television video copies of what Apollo 11 beamed to Earth 40 years ago and made the pictures look sharper.

NASA emphasized the video isn’t “new” — just better quality.

“There’s nothing being created; there’s nothing being manufactured,” said NASA senior engineer Dick Nafzger, who’s in charge of the project.

But some details seem new because of their sharpness. Originally, Neil Armstrong’s face visor was too fuzzy to be seen clearly. The refurbished video shows his visor and a reflection in it.

The $230,000 refurbishing effort is only three weeks into a months-long project, and only 40 percent of the work has been done. But it does show improvements in four snippets: Mr. Armstrong climbing down the ladder, which includes the face visor image; Buzz Aldrin climbing down the ladder; the two astronauts reading a plaque they left on the moon; the planting of the flag on the moon.

The original videos beamed to Earth were stored on giant reels of tapes that each contained 15 minutes of video, along with 13 other channels of live data from the moon. In the 1970s and 1980s, NASA had a shortage of the tapes and erased about 200,000 of those tapes and reused them. That’s apparently what happened to the famous moon-landing footage.

Mr. Nafzger praised the restored work for its crispness. The restoration company, Lowry Digital of Burbank, Calif., also has refurbished “Star Wars” and James Bond films, along with “Casablanca.”

The company noted that the last film had a pixel count 10 times higher than the moon video, meaning the moon footage was fuzzier than that vintage movie and more of a challenge in one sense.

But the moon video also was three continuous hours, not chopped up as movies are, which made some of the work easier, said Lowry President Mike Inchalik.

Of all the video the company has dealt with, he said, “This is by far and away the lowest quality.”

The restoration used four video sources: CBS News originals, kinescopes from the National Archives, a video from Australia that received the transmission of the original moon video, and camera shots looking at a TV monitor.

Both Mr. Nafzger and Mr. Inchalik said they went to extremes to enhance the video as conservatively as possible.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide