- The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 7, 2009

RICHMOND | Lawyers for a Virginia inmate scheduled to die next week for killing a 16-year-old — then bragging about it to prosecutors when he thought he couldn’t face the death penalty — are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the execution.

Paul Warner Powell’s lawyers argue that he was unconstitutionally convicted twice for the 1999 murder and attempted rape of Stacey Reed.

Powell, 31, was convicted in 2000 of killing Stacey and raping as well as trying to kill her 14-year-old sister. He was sentenced to die for Stacey’s murder.

The Virginia Supreme Court overturned Powell’s capital conviction, saying that Prince William County prosecutors failed to prove that Powell tried to rob or rape Stacey. In order to face capital punishment, defendants must commit other crimes against the victim or meet other aggravating circumstances.

Thinking he could no longer face the death penalty, Powell wrote a profanity-laced, taunting letter to prosecutors offering graphic detail of how he tried to rape Stacey before he stabbed her three times and stomped on her throat until she quit breathing.

“Do you just hate yourself for being so stupid and for [messing] up and saving me?” he wrote to Commonwealth’s Attorney Paul B. Ebert in 2001.

Mr. Ebert threw out Powell’s earlier indictment and charged him with killing and attempting to rape Stacey.

Powell was convicted again in 2003 and given the death penalty.

Powell’s lawyers asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block the execution until it can decide whether his second capital murder charge violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection against being tried twice for the same offense.

They argue that convicting Powell the second time “sets a dangerous precedent in which prosecutors now may pursue multiple attempts to secure a sentence of death.”

State and federal courts have repeatedly rejected Powell’s double jeopardy argument, saying the original charge was different because he was not accused of attempting to rape Stacey.

A divided federal appeals court panel once again denied Powell’s claim in April, with Justice Roger L. Gregory dissenting.

Justice Gregory called Powell’s crime “atrocious” but said his second conviction amounted to double jeopardy.

“Given the explicit details revealed by Powell in his letter to the Commonwealth’s attorney, one understands the strong inclination to prosecute Powell for those heinous acts,” he wrote. “Yet, it is in these very cases that we must be most vigilant in protecting our long-standing constitutional guarantees.”

Mr. Ebert said he didn’t think the court would stop the execution because Powell was tried for two separate crimes.

“The two things have entirely different elements, entirely different facts, entirely different victims,” he said. “It’s not double jeopardy.”

Mr. Ebert said he plans to witness the execution with Stacey’s family.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide