- The Washington Times - Friday, June 26, 2009


In her discussion of the Berlin uprising of 1989, Suzanne Fields was spot-on when she called it “unlikely” (“Sic semper tyrannis,” Opinion, Thursday). Actually, its success was unlikely. If then-East German President Erich Honecker had had the power to mobilize his military and security troops, the uprisings in Berlin, Leipzig and other cities would have been suppressed brutally and decisively in a matter of days. However, under agreements between East Germany and the Soviet Union, Mr. Honecker could call out the troops only with express permission from Mikhail S. Gorbachev, general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

To this day, I cannot fathom why Mr. Gorbachev declined to give such permission to Mr. Honecker. Mr. Honecker found himself in a box, powerless to put down the uprising and left with no choice other than to resign and flee to Chile. Thus, the “unlikely” uprising, which ordinarily would have been stamped out, succeeded. Its success was due to a sequence of very-low-probability events.

The Iranian protesters experienced the normal flow of events, which meant their demonstrations would be snuffed. The mullah regime does not have a Gorbachev restraining it; on the contrary, Iran’s rulers took the position that they were acting on direct orders from God. One wishes the Iranian people well in their hopes of one day overthrowing the mullahs, but the probability of their doing so at any time in the foreseeable future is close to zero.



Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide