- The Washington Times - Saturday, June 27, 2009

Stymied by Congress so far, the White House is considering issuing an executive order to indefinitely imprison a small number of Guantanamo Bay detainees considered too dangerous to prosecute or release, two administration officials said Friday.

One of the officials told the Associated Press that the order, if issued, would not take effect until after the Oct. 1 start of the upcoming 2010 fiscal year. Already, Congress has blocked the administration from spending any money this year to imprison the detainees in the United States.

But an administration official told The Washington Times Friday there is no order yet and a Justice Department task force evaluating how to handle detainees being held at a U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is still working toward a July deadline.

“There is no executive order and the task force has not completed its work nor made its recommendations,” the official said, asking for anonymity to speak about the status of interagency deliberations.

The administration also is considering asking Congress to pass new laws that would allow the indefinite detentions, the official said.

Both of the officials spoke Friday on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the still-tentative issue publicly. The possibility of an executive order was first reported by ProPublica and The Washington Post.

“A number of options are being considered,” said one of the officials.

Asked if the detainees would be indefinitely held overseas or in the United States, the official said: “There’s not really a lot of options overseas.”

Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union Washington office, said the organization strongly opposes any plans for indefinite detention of prisoners.

“We’re saying it shouldn’t be done at all,” he said Friday.

The Senate Armed Services Committee just completed work on its fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill. It was silent on the matter of indefinite detentions, according to a Senate aide familiar with the bill.

Without legislative backing, an executive order is the only route Mr. Obama has to get the needed authority.

The order also would only apply to current detainees at Guantanamo - and not ones caught and held in future counterinsurgent battles.

There are 229 detainees currently being held at Guantanamo. Several have been transferred to United States for prosecution, while others have been sent to foreign nations. The Obama administration is trying to relocate as many as 100 Yemeni detainees to Saudi Arabia for rehabilitation.

Mr. Obama said last month he was looking at continued imprisonment for a small number of Guantanamo detainees whom he described as too dangerous to release. He called it “the toughest issue we will face.”

“I am not going to release individuals who endanger the American people,” Mr. Obama said during a May 21 speech at the National Archives. “Al Qaeda terrorists and their affiliates are at war with the United States, and those that we capture - like other prisoners of war - must be prevented from attacking us again.”

It’s not clear how many detainees could fall into that category. Defense and Justice Department officials have privately said at least some could be freed at trial because prosecutors would be reluctant to expose classified evidence against the detainees.

A Pentagon task force is currently reviewing every case to see which are eligible for transfer or release, which could face trial in civilian U.S. courts, which are best suited to some version of a military commission, and which fall into the category to which Mr. Obama was referring: too dangerous to free, but against whom legal cases would be difficult to mount because of the manner in which evidence was gathered - coercion by cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

Times staff writer Stephen Dinan contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide