- The Washington Times - Sunday, March 1, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Today we take a tough-truth look at just why it is that many Americans seem to believe that the word “liberal” is really just a prefix to the word “media.”

Consider the coverage of the Feb. 18 remarks by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. at the Justice Department’s African American History Month Program. Or, as you probably better know it, Mr. Holder’s “nation of cowards” speech.

The next morning, the newspapers that brought the news to the Washingtonians who still read their news devoted more than 1,000 words to the attorney general’s remarks. Here is a more specific breakdown:

- 960 words in The Washington Times, in a story that stretched across five columns of the front page, above the fold. Headline: “Holder calls U.S. ‘nation of cowards’.” A sub-head elaborated: “Vows Justice will keep fight on civil rights.”

- 214 words in The Washington Post, in a brief report shoehorned into the bottom of page 2A, wrapped around ads for Rolex watches and “Low Toyota prices!” Headline: “Holder Urges Justice Dept. Workers to Discuss Race Openly.”

- 0 - that’s a zero - words in the New York Times, Washington edition. No story about Mr. Holder’s speech about race in America.

Attorney General Holder had actually delivered a message about race relations in the United States that was, in many ways, thoughtful and measured. He wanted all Americans to reflect upon this thought: “Simply put, to get to the heart of this country one must examine its racial soul. … We must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other, to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us.” And he wanted America to use every February, which is black history month, as a vehicle for doing just that.

But Mr. Holder shattered any positive impact his message might convey, by indulging in a dip into hyperbole in which he used language that was not just inflammatory but imprecise, and borderline irresponsible: “Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.”

Interestingly, both The Washington Post and New York Times did carry major pieces about Mr. Holder’s “nation of cowards” remark - but not on their news pages. The Post ran an editorial headlined “A Nation of Cowards?” that took issue with his phrase while supporting his larger message. New York Times op-ed columnist Charles M. Blow ran a thoughtful column under the identical headline, discussing polls that showed hidden racial bias.

Was The Washington Times, an editorially conservative newspaper that has become increasingly even-handed in its news coverage, right to seize upon that last controversial quote? Or was The Washington Post right to downplay it? Or the New York Times right to not play it?

Consider what the coverage would have been in recent years past, if Vice President Cheney or either of President Bush’s attorneys general (John Ashcroft or Alberto Gonzales) had blurted a suggestion that opponents of hard-line interrogation of terror suspects would turn America into a nation of cowards.

It would be bannered news everywhere. That’s why, this time, The Washington Times coverage was right on. Partisans of shout radio and the blogosphere seem to see it as the latest example of sinister forces surfacing in the mainstream news media.

But Washington Post assistant managing editor for national news Kevin Merida responded to a query by explaining that the Post’s editors didn’t find out about Mr. Holder’s remarks until late in the day and rushed to get even that brief story into the paper. “In hindsight, I wish we would have given it more prominence,” Mr. Merida candidly added. “But it served to prompt another story idea that we have launched.” (New York Times editors did not respond to a similar query.)

So, at least at the Post, this was not a case of a liberal media protecting a favorite.

Just a mistake that led to a misplay. It’s time to move on.

Martin Schram is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide