- The Washington Times - Thursday, March 12, 2009

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama’s ambitious new budget faced bipartisan skepticism Thursday as key senators questioned the administration’s long-term budget outlook and the deficits it envisions rising in the middle of the next decade.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended it in testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, saying current increases in spending are short term and will have to be substantially reduced to get the country back into fiscal shape.

Still, the Democratic chairman of the Budget Committee, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, called the track of future deficits “unsustainable” and singled out Obama’s proposal for spending $634 billion on health care over the next 10 years.

Pelosi, other Democrats pocket campaign cash from owners of sex-trafficking website
Football coach fired for praying gets handshake at White House
Trump slams Virginia Gov. Northam for 'very serious attack' on 2nd Amendment

“Some of us have a real pause about the notion of putting substantially more money into the health care system when we’ve already got a bloated system,” he said.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., complained that the budget does not tackle rising entitlement spending on Social Security and Medicare. Geithner countered that the administration intends to confront rising health care costs with broad reforms that will significantly reduce Medicare spending.

Geithner is at the center of the president’s economic policy, advocating both it’s budget proposals and it’s tax policies, but also a $700 billion rescue program for the financial sector.

Geithner was facing questions on all those fronts Thursday. By the end of the day, he was scheduled to leave for talks Friday and Saturday in London with finance officials from the Group of 20 nations.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Al., dismissed Geithner’s defense of the budget as “campaign mode.”

“This budget is based on more taxes, more spending and more debt,” Sessions said.

The president’s budget would raise taxes, starting in 2011, on individuals earning more than $200,000 and on households earning more than $250,000. Geithner said the increases would kick in after the economy is expected to be in recovery.

But Geithner sidestepped a question by Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, who asked whether the administraiton would let the increases take effect if the economy has not recovered in two years. “We have to watch how the economy evolves,” Geithner said.

Meanwhile, the White House was immersed in a conference with state officials gathered to hear details about how the $787 billion in stimulus money will be disbursed. And on Capitol Hill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., tamped down suggestions earlier this week that Democrats would consider a second economic stimulus package.

“I know that people have made suggestions that we should be ready to do something, but I really would like to see this stimulus package play out,” Pelosi said, adding later: “It’s just not something that, right now, is in the cards.”

The president appeared shortly after Vice President Joe Biden opened the White House meeting by warning states that if they misuse money from the stimulus package, they shouldn’t expect more help from the federal government for a long time.

“If we don’t get this right, folks, this is the end of the ability to convince Congress that anything should go to the states,” Biden said.

Obama echoed Biden’s theme, saying that “if we see money being misspent, we’re going to put a stop to it.”

The conference was billed as a way for state officials to propose and discuss ideas for spending the money, as well as to hear from several Cabinet secretaries and other administration officials.

“We are all on the line,” Biden said. “The American people are looking for us to get this right. And you need to do that.”

Obama told the state officials they were “at the front lines of what is probably the most important task that we have in this country over the next couple of years and that is getting the economy going again.”

He said that as bad as economic conditions are, the work of the federal, state and local governments now carries with it the opportunity to “lay the foundation” for long-term growth.

“The American people are behind what we’re doing, and they’re going to be watching very carefully,” he said. “What you do in the coming weeks, in the coming months, in the next couple years, is going to make a huge difference in whether the trust people have placed in us will be justified.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide