- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 12, 2009



“President Obama called for overturning a ban on publicly funded abortions in Washington, D.C., as part of his budget proposal, but did not overturn the national ban on federal funding. Do you agree with him?”

It was poorly written at best and disingenuous at worst. The premise leading up to the question is composed of two separate issues - the first being Mr. Obama’s call for overturning the ban on publicly funded abortions in the District and the second being his (so far) not overturning the national ban on federal funding for abortions.

If one favors Mr. Obama’s call to overturn the D.C. ban, then one most likely would be against his failure to overturn the federal ban. Conversely, if one is against his call to overturn the D.C. ban, one most likely would support the fact that Mr. Obama has yet to call for overturning the federal ban. Logical consistency requires a separate response to each issue, and therefore the question “Do you agree with him?” is useless in gathering any accurate metric of public opinion.


Louisville, Neb.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide