- The Washington Times - Friday, May 29, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Gene Mueller’s column on the dangers of individual fishing quotas (IFQs) in the Gulf of Mexico aptly describes some of the problems fishermen could face if quota systems become the leading fishery-management tool there (“Free market taking over Gulf,” Sports, May 10). Traditional IFQ programs are, in practice, equivalent to making a public resource - our fish - like private property because only certain people are allowed to catch them. There are other problems associated with this type of management, too.

IFQs can result in significant job losses. Small-business fishermen or those who fish for multiple types of fish often get squeezed out, and any new fishermen who want to enter the business can be shut out. With fewer fishermen, even small businesses that support fishing communities - such as tackle shops - could be forced to close. In addition, the IFQ plan may increase by-catch and will be expensive to run.

The process by which the plan was designed excluded the majority of those whose livelihoods will be at stake. About 69 percent of permit holders were not allowed to participate in the vote on whether the plan should move forward. The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council should reconsider plans to implement IFQs in the Gulf.

MARIANNE CUFONE

Fish program director

Food & Water Watch

Washington


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide