- The Washington Times - Friday, November 13, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Arnaud de Borchgrave misrepresents the critique presented by Israel’s supporters against the much-trumpeted Goldstone Commission report (“No fix soon on Palestinian question,” Opinion, Oct. 26). The problem is not the barrister’s eminence, reputation, character or predilections toward self-hatred. The problem is that the report is sponsored by known violators of human rights.

Furthermore, it misstates the international law defining when territories are or are not occupied. Gaza is not, as purported, under any kind of rationally conceived Israeli authority; otherwise, the Gazan military campaign would have been superfluous. Consequently, Hamas can claim no “right of resistance.”

Last, the report defies clear video evidence in denying Hamas use of human shields even as it exploits chaperoned eyewitness testimony to portray civilians caught in crossfire as victims deliberately butchered because they were civilians.

Its excessive partiality undermines its credibility. Richard J. Goldstone’s methods, not psychology, are at issue.

PAUL FREEDMAN

Falls Church


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide