- The Washington Times - Tuesday, November 24, 2009

They don’t all need glasses. But if you always suspected basketball referees are biased - well, you might be right, according to a couple of professors who have studied the matter.

Refs favor the home team, the academics say. They’re big on “make-up” calls. They make more calls against teams in the lead, and the discrepancy grows if the game is on national TV.

The professors studied 365 college games during the 2004-05 season and found that refs had a terrific knack for keeping the foul count even, regardless of which team was more aggressive.

Exhibit A: The 2005 Final Four meeting between Illinois and Louisville. The Illini, known for playing a more aggressive defense, got whistled for the first seven fouls. By the end of the game, the foul count was Louisville 13, Illinois 12. The Illini won 72-57.

Results like this were the norm across all the games the professors studied from that season - from the Big East to the ACC to the Big Ten and all 63 NCAA tournament games. The take-home message for coaches: The more aggressive your team the better because, in the end, the foul count is going to be about even no matter what.

It helps explain, the professors say, why college basketball has gotten increasingly physical over the past 25 years.

“Part of the reason for the study came from something my coach used to tell me,” said study co-author Kyle Anderson, a visiting professor at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business who played at Division III Knox College. “He said a team can come in and push and shove and grab and hold, and by the end of the game or end of the half, they’ve only got one or two more fouls because officials kind of get tired of calling it.”

Among the key findings, which were published in the Journal of Sports Sciences earlier this year:

c The probability of a foul being called on the visiting team was 7 percent higher than on the home team.

c When the home team is leading, the probability of the next foul being called on them was about 6.3 percentage points higher than when the home team was trailing. The professors also cited an earlier study that concluded there were more calls against teams ahead in games on national TV vs. those ahead in locally televised games. Calling fouls against the leading team tends to keep games closer, the studies said.

c The bigger the difference in fouls between the two teams playing, the more likely it was that the next call would come against the team with fewer fouls. When the home team had five or more fouls than the visiting team, there was a 69 percent chance the visiting team would be whistled for the next foul.

As part of their 365-game sample, the professors looked at 93 games played on neutral courts, and the numbers remained largely the same when it came to leveling the foul count.

“There’s something to it,” said Irv Brown, a former official who worked six Final Fours and was supervisor of officials for the Western Athletic and Big Sky conferences. “If you’re looking at the board and one team has a lot more fouls, you probably look a little harder to do something, subconsciously.”

Brown said he used to experiment and try not to look at the scoreboard, but human nature dictates that referees will. Same for homecourt advantage. Try as they might, there’s no way a referee can completely block out thousands of fans yelling at him from close range.

“As an official, you get the reputation that you’re tough on the road, and that’s what you want,” Brown said in a telephone interview last week. “But it takes a lot of years. You have to get established. Some guys who aren’t established, you’ll see them out there, trying to take some of the heat off, trying to take care of the home crowd.”

Anderson said he talked to a number of referees as part of the research, and the majority said, “You’re crazy. We don’t do this.”

“But a few others said, ‘Yeah, I try to make it even out,’ ” Anderson said.

The NCAA asked for a copy of the study, and Anderson said he hasn’t received any negative feedback - at least not yet.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide