- The Washington Times - Friday, October 30, 2009

LONDON | The city’s largest cemetery is having a tough time convincing Londoners to share a grave with a stranger.

“A lot of people say, ‘I’m not putting my dad in a secondhand grave,’ ” said Gary Burks, superintendent and registrar of the City of London Cemetery, final resting place of close to 1 million Londoners. “You have to deal with that mind-set.”

The problem is a very British one. Many other European countries regularly reuse old graves after a couple of decades. Britain does not, as a result of Victorian hygiene obsession, piecemeal regulation and national tradition. For many, an Englishman’s tomb, like his home, is his castle.

Student says teacher yanked 'Women for Trump' pin off chest, files police report: 'It's not OK'
Rashida Tlaib deletes tweet blaming 'white supremacy' for New Jersey shooting
Atheist group's legal threats succeed; 3rd-graders' nativity scene pulled from holiday show

That view is also common in the United States, which like Britain tends to regard graves as eternal and not to be disturbed - although the United States has a lot more space, so the burial crisis is less acute.

In much of Britain, reusing old graves remains illegal, but the City of London cemetery is exploiting a legal loophole that allows graves in the capital with remaining space in them to be reclaimed after 75 years.

Mr. Burks points to a handsome marble obelisk carrying the details of the recently departed man buried underneath. The name of a Victorian Londoner interred in the same plot is inscribed on the other side. The monument has simply been turned around for its new user - whose family, Mr. Burks says, got a fancy stone monument for much less than the market price by agreeing to share.

Since a change in the law last year, cemetery staff have begun the even more sensitive process of digging up old remains, reburying them deeper and putting new corpses on top, in what have been dubbed “double-decker” graves. They’ll be sold for the same price as the cemetery’s regular “lawn” graves - those in open grassy areas - or about $3,200.

Mr. Burks, a burly man who began working at the cemetery as a groundsman and gravedigger almost 25 years ago, said reusing graves will buy the rapidly filling cemetery six or seven more years of burials.

So far, no other cemeteries have followed City of London in reusing graves. Many Britons have an instinctive resistance to the idea of grave-sharing.

“I don’t even want to think about it,” said Temi Oshinowo, a 29-year-old London receptionist. “It’s not showing respect. It doesn’t matter whether or not the person has been buried for 25 years or 100 years, that is their space and you should give them respect.”

Martina Possedoni, a 23-year-old saleswoman, agreed.

“It’s like a second home and it’s weird to think a stranger is in your home with you,” she said.

It’s an attitude that frustrates advocates of grave reuse. Julie Rugg of the Cemetery Research Group at the University of York in northern England jokes that Britain’s problem is that “we weren’t invaded by Napoleon.” Countries that adopted the Napoleonic Code have been reusing graves for almost 200 years.

“We just need to get on with reusing graves,” Ms. Rugg said. “Grave reuse gifts back to us our Victorian cemeteries to use again.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide