- The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 1, 2009


In his letter to The Washington Times (“Double standard of living,” Letters, Friday), John Blanenship raises the Federal Employee Health Benefit (FEHB) program for civilian employees as an example of government-run health insurance. Mr. Blanenship argues that those in Congress who are covered by the FEHB and oppose the president’s health care reform efforts oppose them to deny the president a “win.”

The FEHB program is not government-run health insurance. The federal government administers the program and develops the minimum terms that private insurance providers must meet. Private insurers then bid for the business of individual federal employees, who are offered a wide variety of plans with different features and prices. The employee determines which plan is best for himself.

This is quite the opposite of the single-payer and other “one size fits all” models that some would like to see, because it offers the individual employee choices and the benefits of competition. Some who have pushed for health insurance reform point to the FEHB as an example of a something that should be adopted more widely.



Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide