- The Washington Times - Sunday, September 13, 2009

SACRAMENTO, Calif. | California lawmakers ended a legislative year dominated by an unprecedented fiscal crisis without an agreement on their top policy priority - an ambitious upgrade of the state’s water delivery and storage system.

Democrats and Republicans believed there was enough momentum to try again and vowed to continue meeting in a yet-unannounced special session. Each side said it is determined to fix a problem that has bedeviled lawmakers and governors for decades.

But the state Senate session ended with a bitter partisan battle early Saturday, after Republicans blocked all bills requiring a two-thirds vote, raising doubts about whether there really is enough goodwill to reach an accord on major policy issues such as water.

California lawmakers spent the last day of the regular legislative session Friday passing a flurry of bills, including legislation that would reduce the state prison population by 16,000 inmates. Lawmakers also approved the nation’s most ambitious renewable-energy standards.

They fell short of their goal to upgrade the state’s decades-old water system, which was expected to be the most contentious issue. The Democratic leaders of the Assembly and Senate said they would ask Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to call a special session so the water negotiations could continue.

“Everyone agrees that we are close and that we have made a decade’s worth of progress in just a few weeks, but there is still some more work to do,” Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said.

Jeff Macedo, a spokesman for Mr. Schwarzenegger, said the governor had no immediate response.

The Democrats offered a package that would include $12 billion in bonds, half of which they said would go toward reservoirs, underground water storage and restoring the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the heart of California’s water-delivery system.

According to a draft of the water bills, the bonds would be divided over two elections - one next year and one in 2014. About $3 billion would be dedicated to increasing water storage, but the money would be awarded by a commission based on a competition between potential projects.

Republicans said the bills’ language would make it difficult to fund new dams, a priority for the minority party. Sen. Dave Cogdill of Modesto, one of the Republicans’ lead negotiators, called the Democratic package unacceptable.

“The proposals that the majority were putting up for a vote would have not added a single drop of new water in our state,” he said. “Republicans agree our fragile delta needs to be fixed, but we have been clear that environmental protection should not come at the price of economic destruction.”

GOP lawmakers said the legislation contained a loophole that would prevent additional dams from being built. They worry that a commission would favor underground storage.

Republicans also oppose splitting the bonds over two election cycles, saying voters should have a chance to vote on a single package intended to solve the state’s water problems for years to come. They also criticized a Democratic proposal to create a new bureaucracy to oversee how farmers could use water they receive from the delta.

In a statement after the water proposal fizzled, Mr. Steinberg and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass said they remained confident the Legislature could still pass a comprehensive water package.

“Any time you have Westlands Water District and the Natural Resources Defense Council united, you know you are close, and that’s what we had here. That’s how far we had come,” said Ms. Bass, referring to one of California’s major agricultural irrigation districts and a leading environmental group.

Republican lawmakers and Mr. Schwarzenegger have been adamant that any water legislation include dedicated funding for new dams and create a process by which the state will consider building a canal to route fresh water around the environmentally sensitive delta.

It wasn’t clear whether the Democratic plan being circulated Friday met the governor’s criteria or whether he would agree to the calls for a special session. He already has called special sessions on education and tax reform.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide