- The Washington Times - Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Agents of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are feuding over bomb investigations - racing each other to crime scenes, failing to share information and refusing to train together, according to a draft report obtained by the Associated Press.

The report says Justice Department bosses have repeatedly failed to fix the breach.

The Justice Department’s Inspector General, Glenn Fine, has drafted a preliminary report on the two agencies’ repeated squabbles to claim jurisdiction in investigations of explosives incidents across the country - from Times Square in New York City to Arizona and the West Coast.

The most recent documented spat came last December when the FBI protested a local prosecutor’s request to use the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to investigate a blast that killed a local bomb technician in Woodburn, Ore.

FBI and ATF supervisors “tend to deploy their employees to the larger, more sensational explosives incidents, sometimes racing each other to be the first federal agency on the scene and disputing upon arrival which agency should lead the investigation,” according to a draft version of the report.

“Such conflicts can delay investigations, undermine federal and local relationships, and may project to local agency responders a disjointed federal response to explosives incidents in their area,” the draft report found.

Officials in both agencies claim such problems have been resolved, yet the report stated that “disputes between the FBI and ATF continue to occur.”

Changes and corrections are still being made to the draft document.

FBI and ATF officials did not immediately comment. A Justice spokeswoman declined to comment on the draft.

The report, which analyzes the agencies’ interactions from 2003 to early 2009, is expected to be released later this month, though an exact date was uncertain.

So-called “battles of the badges” between different law enforcement agencies are nothing new, but the ill will between FBI and ATF dates back decades and has survived the 2002 transfer of ATF from the Treasury Department to Justice. Some had thought putting the agencies in the same department might end the feud, but the Justice Department has spent years trying to get the two sides to cooperate.

The inspector general said the problem is exacerbated by the fact that Justice Department instructions don’t clearly spell out who is in charge of federal responses to crime scenes involving explosives.

The confusion lies in the mandate of each agency: The FBI is charged with investigating terrorism in any form, and the ATF is charged with investigating incidents in which explosives were used as a weapon.

Often, it is hard to tell when police first arrive on the scene whether the motive behind a bomb or explosive device is terrorism or something else.

Traditionally, it has been the job of the No. 2 official at the Justice Department to resolve such issues. But the inspector general found that for years deputy attorneys general have failed to do so, despite written instructions issued in 2004 and 2008.

“We believe it is critical that DOJ issue a new directive to clearly define lead investigative authority between the FBI and ATF and require coordination of investigative actions,” the draft report recommends.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide