- The Washington Times - Thursday, April 22, 2010

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is heading to a meeting of NATO ministers in Estonia at a time when the 61-year-old organization is suffering from a kind of mid-life crisis.

Almost 20 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the 28-member North Atlantic Treaty Organization is in the midst of an intense self-examination, trying to rethink its basic purpose.

NATO was founded to blunt the long-extinct threat of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe.

Now it finds itself divided on many fronts: doubts among some members about its combat mission in Afghanistan, unease with the continuing presence of U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe, prickly relations with Moscow and concerns about the wisdom of expanding NATO deeper into Russia’s backyard.

Mrs. Clinton and 27 of her NATO counterparts will gather Thursday in Tallinn, capital of the former Soviet state of Estonia, where they’re expected to take stock of the alliance and the challenges it faces.

Among the most difficult issues on the agenda are NATO’s outlook for success in Afghanistan and the prospects for putting the Balkan nation of Bosnia on track toward NATO membership.

The foreign ministers also are expected to debate the future of the U.S. nuclear umbrella for Europe, which boils down to a question of whether to withdraw the remaining Cold War-era U.S. nuclear weapons there.

The Tallinn meeting, in fact, could split over the question of whether it’s time to remove an estimated 200 U.S. nuclear bombs that remain at six air bases in five NATO countries.

The Obama administration hasn’t taken a public position on the fate of this small but politically nettlesome nuclear arsenal. Administration officials say NATO should debate the matter and make a collective decision.

But the U.S. is trying to persuade Russia to match any Western reductions of these short-range nuclear weapons with cuts of its own. Some in Europe, including the Germans, are less certain that such linkage is needed.

The meeting also is likely to review progress in rewriting what NATO calls its “strategic concept,” updating its mission statement for the first time since 1999.

That document predated the Sept. 11 attacks, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the August 2008 conflict between Russia and Georgia, which is eagerly pursuing NATO membership.

A final draft spelling out NATO’s new mission is to be endorsed when President Obama and other alliance leaders meet in November.

U.S. relations with Europe have deteriorated in recent years, in part because of opposition inside the alliance to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

One of Mr. Obama’s main foreign policy goals upon entering the White House was to repair ties with Europe, while also “resetting” relations with Russia, which regards NATO expansion as a threat to its influence in the former Soviet Union.

There is no serious talk inside NATO of dismantling the alliance but, as analyst Stephen Flanagan of the Center for Strategic and International Studies put it in an interview, “Some are questioning what it’s for.”

The original purpose was framed in purely defensive terms: to protect Western Europe from a potential land invasion by the Soviet Union.

Today there is no Soviet Union, and no credible military threat to NATO as a whole. But the Russia-Georgia war served as a reminder to other former Soviet republics that are now NATO members — like the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — that their neighborhood is still dangerous.

NATO’s Western European members, including Germany, are more likely to view Russia as a major trading partner and source of natural gas and oil.

Central and Eastern European members of the alliance view Russia more uneasily because of Moscow’s history as an imperial power. The new members of the NATO club tend to see the alliance’s nuclear arsenal as a counterbalance to Russia’s military might.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide