The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday voted to allow the federal government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt — or about $6,000 more for every U.S. resident.
The measure, approved 217-212, would raise the cap on federal borrowing to $14.3 trillion. That’s enough to keep Congress from having to vote again before the November elections on an issue that is feeding a sense among voters that the government is spending too much and putting future generations under a mountain of debt to do it.
Already, the accumulated debt amounts to roughly $40,000 per person, and the debt increasingly is held by foreign nations such as China.
Passage of the bill sends it to President Obama, who will sign it to avoid a first-ever, market-rattling default on U.S. obligations.
“I can’t think of a more reckless or irresponsible act. Defaulting is not an option,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, Massachusetts Democrat. “If the United States defaults, investors will lose confidence that the U.S. will honor its debts in the future.”
Democrats barely passed the increase through the Senate last week over a unanimous “no” vote from GOP members present.
To help win passage, Democrats are also adopting — in a vote later Thursday afternoon — budget rules designed to curb a spiraling upward annual deficit, projected by Mr. Obama to hit a record $1.56 trillion for the budget year ending Sept. 30. The new rules would require future spending increases or tax cuts to be paid for with either cuts to other programs or equivalent tax increases.
If the rules are broken, the White House budget office would force automatic cuts to programs such as Medicare, farm subsidies and unemployment insurance. Current rules lack such teeth and commonly have been waived over the past few years at a cost of almost $1 trillion.
Most other benefit programs — including Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps — would be exempt from such cuts, and Republicans said that the rules lack teeth.
“In place of real fiscal discipline, it offers a phony pay-as-you-go rule that is more loopholes and exceptions and does nothing to tackle our government’s long-term structural deficit,” said Rep. Pete Sessions, Texas Republican.
Skeptics say lawmakers also will find ways around the new rules fairly easily. Congress, for example, can declare some spending an “emergency” — a likely scenario for votes later this month to extend jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed.
And, indeed, there already are exceptions to the new rules, such as for extending former President George W. Bush’s middle-class tax cuts past their expiration a year from now. That would add $1.4 trillion to the federal debt over the next decade.
But some new White House initiatives, such as doubling the child-care tax credit for families earning less than $85,000, also would have to live within the rules, as would continuing subsidies for laid-off workers to buy health insurance, unless lawmakers make another exception.
And the rules also mean that two years from now, lawmakers would have to raise taxes to pay for continuing lower tax rates on large inheritances and to protect millions of middle-class taxpayers from feeling the bite of the alternative minimum tax.
“We will have the will, and we will have the discipline,” promised House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Maryland Democrat.
The so-called pay-as-you-go rules have been a mantra with conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats in the House, who insisted they wouldn’t vote to raise the debt ceiling without them.
“We don’t have a choice,” said Rep. John Tanner, Tennessee Democrat. “We are on an unsustainable march toward a fiscal Armageddon.”
Mr. Obama’s budget projects the government’s debt doubling to $26 trillion over the next decade. It offers few solutions for seriously closing the gap other than promising to appoint a bipartisan commission to come up with a plan to address the problem.