- The Washington Times - Friday, February 26, 2010

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

In his letter to the editor on Wednesday, “Homosexuals’ next demand: tax preferences,” Louis Samuel brought up the question of legally married homosexuals and taxation. This problem would never arise if marriage were properly defined.

The world’s major religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) and most countries recognize marriage as a contract between one man and one woman for the purpose of using sex to have children. More precisely, marriage is a sexual contract between a man and a woman who can commit acts fit for the begetting of new human life. Homosexuals having sexual acts among themselves cannot fulfill this requirement, and, hence, they cannot be “married.”

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig. Definitions are not arbitrary. They must be based on objective reality.

ANTHONY LUTZ

Vienna, Va.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide