- The Washington Times - Sunday, March 21, 2010


Democratic House leaders predicted Sunday the final tally on President Barack Obama’s historic health care bill will meet or exceed the 216 votes required for passage. Still at issue were the votes of a handful of members concerned about the abortion issue.

In a show of confidence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi emerged from the final Democratic caucus before the vote wielding a large gavel and leading Democrats across the street to the Capitol for the final series of tallies.

“We are doing this for the American people,” Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, said.

Outside, a protester yelled, “You’re doing this to the American people!” Others chanted Pelosi’s name and shouted: “Kill the bill! Kill the bill!”

Supporters cheered the speaker and other Democrats as they entered the Capitol.

Inside the House chamber, negotiations continued on the floor while overhead in the visitors gallery, a protester hollered, “The people don’t want this!” As ushers tried to escort him out, several Republicans stood up on the House floor and cheered.

A few hundred protesters carrying signs opposing the health care overhaul crowded a grassy area near the House side of the Capitol. One sign read, “This bill is anti-American, vote the bums out,” while another stated, “Obamacare (equals) death warrant for grandma.” Appearing to outnumber Americans flags were banners with the Colonial-era slogan “Don’t tread on me.”

Amid the heat, Democratic leaders said they had only a few votes left to lock in. But none was willing to declare victory — a hesitance Republicans attributed to public controversy over the plan in a difficult election year.

The legislation, affecting virtually every American and more than a year in the making, would extend coverage to an estimated 32 million uninsured, bar insurers from denying coverage on the basis of existing medical conditions, and cut federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion over a decade.

Congressional analysts estimate the cost of the two bills combined would be $940 billion over a decade.

Rep. Bart Stupak, Michigan Democrat, said he was one of about a half-dozen anti-abortion Democrats who were working out language for a presidential executive order that would have provided more assurances that no public money would be used for elective abortions.

Although Rep. Henry A. Waxman, California Democrat, said his understanding was that Mr. Stupak had agreed to vote “yes,” Mr. Stupak said no deal had been made.

“I’m a ‘no’ vote. There’s no agreement. There is no agreement,” Mr. Stupak told reporters Sunday afternoon. “We were close, and we went one step forward and two back.”

As the House opened the rare Sunday session, Democrats showed progress toward the crucial threshold. Retiring Rep. Brian Baird, Washington Democrat, announced he would switch his “no” vote to “yes,” convinced, he said, that the legislation was better than doing nothing.

A key anti-abortion lawmaker, Rep. Marcy Kaptur, Ohio Democrat, stepped from undecided to a “yes” vote because she believes the bill would not allow federal money to be used for elective abortions.

At the White House, Mr. Obama surprised his senior staff by showing up at a meeting. He was expected to make and take calls from lawmakers as the session wore on.

Across the Capitol, Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, said the Senate would be able to muster the majority required to pass a package of fixes. Republicans warned that passage would mean doom for the Democratic majority on Election Day.

House Democrats were cautious but optimistic that they’d get to or beyond 216 votes.

“There are still members looking at it and trying to make up their minds,” House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in the hours before the vote. He added that the holdouts numbered in “the low single digits.”

“We think there are going to be 216-plus votes when we call the roll,” Mr. Hoyer said.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida Democrat and the party’s deputy whip, also said the votes were not yet in hand, telling “Fox News Sunday” that Democrats were still short of “a hard 216.”

It was unclear whether Obama would agree to issue an executive order about abortion funding. Long-standing federal policy bars U.S. aid for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother’s life is in danger.

“We have received assurances that we will work with the administration to assure that existing law is maintained — not to change it in any way, but to make sure that it applies to this bill,” Ms. Kaptur said.

The GOP remains resolutely opposed to the legislation and warned they will make Democrats pay dearly in the fall elections when control of Congress is at stake if the fiercely debated measure becomes law. Republicans said they would push to repeal the bill, contending the plan amounts to a government takeover of health care that will lead to higher deficits and taxes.

“The American people don’t want this to pass. The Republicans don’t want this to pass. There will be no Republican votes for this bill,” House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican, told ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.

With Obama’s emotional appeal from Saturday ringing in their ears, House Democratic leaders prepared for three showdown votes expected in the afternoon or evening. First up: a “rule” to establish debate guidelines; then a package of changes to a Senate-passed bill, including deletion of special Medicaid benefits for Nebraska; and finally, the Senate bill itself, the focus of intense national debate for months.

Democrats need 216 votes to pass each one. With all 178 Republicans and at least two dozen Democrats vowing to vote no, the legislation’s fate lay in the hands of the Democrats who remained uncommitted ahead of Sunday’s vote.

If Democratic leaders prevail on all three House votes, Obama could sign the Senate version of the bill into law. The bill of “fixes” would go to the Senate under fast-track debate rules, called reconciliation, that would enable Democrats to pass it without facing a Republican filibuster.

Democrats control 59 of the Senate’s 100 seats, one vote shy of the number needed to overcome bill-killing filibusters from a united GOP.

House Democrats have long insisted that senators agree to change the bill that the Senate passed on Christmas Eve. Since then, it became deeply unpopular with many Americans because of the special deal for Nebraska, a new tax on generous employer-provided health plans and other aspects.

Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Alan Fram, Laurie Kellman and Natasha Metzler contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide