- The Washington Times - Monday, November 26, 2012

Stung by their election defeat, Republicans are eager to try to woo Hispanic voters, arguing that once their party puts immigration reform behind them, the ethnic group will be open to the GOP’s conservative message.

But an analysis of economic and social data suggests that even outside of immigration, native-born Hispanics, who make up the vast majority of such voters in the U.S., have far higher rates of welfare use, single-parent households and low tax liabilities — all factors that usually indicate a better fit with the Democratic Party than with Republicans.

One in 5 households headed by U.S.-born Hispanics are in poverty, compared with just 10 percent of non-Hispanic U.S.-born white households, and 40 percent of the Hispanic households use at least one major welfare program — twice the rate of white households.

They are only half as likely to be self-employed, and 50 percent of their households with children are single-mother homes, compared with just 29 percent of native-born white homes.

“The underlying demographics make this a population that’s a tough sell for the Republican message,” said Steven A. Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies, who crunched the demographic numbers from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Many in the Republican Party, debating how presidential nominee Mitt Romney lost what they thought was a winnable election, blamed his strict immigration stance, saying it’s the chief reason why he won just 27 percent support from Hispanics en route to losing Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico and other swing states.

Prominent Republicans said the party must embrace a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and House Speaker John A. Boehner said the party will tackle comprehensive immigration reform.

His chamber will take the first step this week, voting on a bill to grant more green cards to would-be immigrants who graduate from U.S. universities with doctoral degrees in science, math and technology fields.

Conservative commentators such as columnist Charles Krauthammer have called for the Republicans to legalize illegal immigrants, arguing if the party can get past that issue, it can tap into what “should be a natural Republican constituency.”

Current and former Republican officeholders echoed that call, saying the party must find ways to reach out to a demographic they argue is overwhelmingly Catholic, socially conservative and pro-entrepreneurial.

Those who study the numbers, though, say that’s a fantasy.

“It turns out that Latinos are systematically to the left of whites on an entire array of economic-policy matters,” said Gary M. Segura, a political scientist at Stanford University and a principal in the polling firm Latino Decisions.

He said that while it’s true that Hispanics are more conservative on abortion — about 38 percent identify themselves as pro-choice, versus about 48 percent of all Americans — that’s not an overwhelming difference. On gay marriage, Hispanics are becoming increasingly supportive.

And even though they may be more religiously observant, they are overwhelmingly opposed to mixing religion and politics, which means social conservatism may not translate to the ballot box. Indeed, family values rarely rate highly when Hispanics are asked what voting issues are important to them.

Mr. Segura said that Republicans should still be doing better among Hispanics and that putting away the immigration issue could help.

But he also said the support likely would top out at about 35 percent, which would be up from the 27 percent support for Mr. Romney this year, and the 31 percent support for Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential run. But it would be less than the 40 percent or so that President George W. Bush won in his 2004 re-election bid.

Alfonso Aguilar, a Bush administration official who is now the executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said the Republican Party has no choice but to try to do better.

“You either engage them, or you become an irrelevant party and movement,” he said. “We already cannot win California and New York. If we continue like this, it’s [next] going to be Florida, Texas, Arizona. That’s it — Republicans will never win another national election.”

He said even though Hispanics use social services more than native-born whites, many of them don’t want to be on welfare, and would vote their aspirations rather than their circumstances if the Republicans didn’t turn them off.

“These are people who are coming here because of our system of liberties and opportunities. They come here, they’re very entrepreneurial, they’re opening businesses three times as fast as the country as a whole,” he said. “When you ask them should government provide more services, they’re probably going to say ‘yes.’ That’s a basic answer. But I think it reflects a view of their home country, where government is huge. But at the same time, I don’t think they want to see a government the size of their home country, where the economy was unsuccessful.”

He said some of the communities that have the deepest, long-term ties to the U.S. — such as Mexicans in the Southwest or Puerto Ricans, who saw a major wave of immigration decades ago to places such as New York and Chicago — do match Democrats’ message better because they “sadly fell through the trap of entitlements.”

But he said for newer immigrants in places such as North Carolina or Georgia, “I don’t think they have that mentality.”

Mr. Camarota’s research data does, indeed, suggest that U.S.-born Hispanics who are third generation or more are worse off on just about every measure than second-generation Hispanics.

Both Mr. Aguilar and Mr. Segura said it will take more than an appeal on immigration to open up Republican channels to Hispanic voters.

But Mr. Aguilar said tackling immigration from a conservative standpoint of family reunification and economic opportunities will at least give the party a chance to be part of the conversation.

“We’re not looking right now to win the majority of Latinos. We can get to that 10, 15 years from now. But right now it’s about getting, consistently, 40 percent,” he said.

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide