- The Washington Times - Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Even as Washington says it wants to eliminate the credits and loopholes in the tax code, the “fiscal cliff” deal Congress agreed to this week is littered with dozens of them.

Tax deductions for college tuition and teachers’ classroom supplies, tax credits for adoptions, and special breaks for businesses that train rescue crews to respond to mine cave-ins are only a few of the giveaways that were criticized by both sides going into negotiations.

Even as he called on Congress to go after “loopholes and deductions that aren’t available to most,” President Obama on Monday touted some tax breaks he fought to keep in the agreement.

“It would extend our tuition tax credit that’s helped millions of families pay for college,” he said. “It would extend tax credits for clean-energy companies that are creating jobs and reducing our dependence on foreign oil.”

It’s not just the president. Republicans also clamor for preferred breaks. The year-end debate has become so routine that it comes with a label: the tax-extenders package.

Special tax breaks have been prime targets in deficit talks for the past three years. Critics say elimination is the fairest way to broaden the tax base.

In 2010, the Bowles-Simpson deficit commission recommended culling many of the deductions and tax breaks and using the revenue to reduce the deficit and bring down marginal tax rates.

During the presidential campaign last year, Republican nominee Mitt Romney based his economic plan on a broad but vague pledge to cut many of the loopholes and use that money to lower tax rates across the board. Mr. Obama campaigned on ending the loopholes and using that money to reduce the deficit.

This week’s agreement, however, deepens the deficit and extends tens of billions of dollars worth of deductions and tax credits that have deep support on both sides of the aisle, making them difficult to cull.

Among the breaks in the deal are several tax cuts to boost biofuels and other renewable energy, at a cost of more than $18 billion over the next decade; tax credits for adoption, valued at $759 million; a $10,000 tax credit for training mine rescue teams, expected to cost the government $5 million; and a credit for businesses to offset the salaries they pay to members of the military reserves who are called up for active duty.

One of the more contentious breaks is $200 million to continue the “cover over” subsidy paid to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands for their rum industries.

Some lawmakers have called for the break to be repealed after the Virgin Islands lured Diageo PLC, a major alcoholic beverage company, to move production from Puerto Rico in exchange for a lucrative package of incentives backed by income from the islands’ cover over.

“Jamming the tax extenders package into the final deal makes a farce of all the tax reform and simplification rhetoric we have been hearing from both parties all year,” said Steve Ellis, vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group. “The likes of NASCAR track owners and liquor conglomerate Diageo will be happy that they are taken care of, but this makes no sense for the average taxpayer or the budget.”

The breaks often are called “tax expenditures” because they seem more like spending provisions, even though they are part of the tax code.

The Congressional Research Service said there are more than 200 tax expenditures, totaling $1.1 trillion in revenue that the government otherwise would have collected this year. That sum is larger than the projected deficit for the year.

Like spending items, the tax breaks all have their champions among federal lobbyists and the public, who argue that they often produce economic growth that outweighs the amount of revenue that the government forgoes.

In talking points released Tuesday, the White House said it will continue to go after deductions and tax credits for those with higher incomes: “The agreement leaves substantial scope for reducing tax expenditures for high-income households, reforming corporate taxes to broaden the base and cut the rate to make America more competitive, and to take further steps to reform entitlements.”

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide